The Epistemology of Collective Testimony
In this paper, I explore what gives collective testimony its epistemic credentials, through a critical discussion of three competing accounts of the epistemology of collective testimony. According to the first view, collective testimony inherits its epistemic credentials from the beliefs the testimo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0044 |
id |
doaj-a2a724f61096473db4a7c062a6d381a5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a2a724f61096473db4a7c062a6d381a52021-09-06T19:40:54ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632021-01-016218721010.1515/jso-2019-0044The Epistemology of Collective TestimonyTownsend Leo0Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Wien, 1010, AustriaIn this paper, I explore what gives collective testimony its epistemic credentials, through a critical discussion of three competing accounts of the epistemology of collective testimony. According to the first view, collective testimony inherits its epistemic credentials from the beliefs the testimony expresses—where this can be seen either as the beliefs of all or some of the group’s members, or as the beliefs of group itself. The second view denies any necessary connection to belief, claiming instead that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the reliability or truth-conduciveness of the statement that expresses the testimony. Finally, the third view claims that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the fact that it involves undertaking a collective commitment to trustworthiness, which makes the group susceptible to rebuke and blame if its testimony is not trustworthy. I argue that this last account holds the most promise for preserving what is distinctive about testimonial knowledge while still underwriting a robust epistemology of collective testimony.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0044collective testimonycollective beliefcollective intentionalitytrustcollective epistemology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Townsend Leo |
spellingShingle |
Townsend Leo The Epistemology of Collective Testimony Journal of Social Ontology collective testimony collective belief collective intentionality trust collective epistemology |
author_facet |
Townsend Leo |
author_sort |
Townsend Leo |
title |
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony |
title_short |
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony |
title_full |
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony |
title_fullStr |
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Epistemology of Collective Testimony |
title_sort |
epistemology of collective testimony |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Journal of Social Ontology |
issn |
2196-9655 2196-9663 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
In this paper, I explore what gives collective testimony its epistemic credentials, through a critical discussion of three competing accounts of the epistemology of collective testimony. According to the first view, collective testimony inherits its epistemic credentials from the beliefs the testimony expresses—where this can be seen either as the beliefs of all or some of the group’s members, or as the beliefs of group itself. The second view denies any necessary connection to belief, claiming instead that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the reliability or truth-conduciveness of the statement that expresses the testimony. Finally, the third view claims that the epistemic credentials of collective testimony derive from the fact that it involves undertaking a collective commitment to trustworthiness, which makes the group susceptible to rebuke and blame if its testimony is not trustworthy. I argue that this last account holds the most promise for preserving what is distinctive about testimonial knowledge while still underwriting a robust epistemology of collective testimony. |
topic |
collective testimony collective belief collective intentionality trust collective epistemology |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0044 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT townsendleo theepistemologyofcollectivetestimony AT townsendleo epistemologyofcollectivetestimony |
_version_ |
1717767482988560384 |