The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.

Syngnathid fishes (pipefishes, seahorses and seadragons) are characterized by a unique mode of paternal care in which embryos develop on or in the male's body, often within a structure known as a brood pouch. Evidence suggests that this pouch plays a role in mediating postcopulatory sexual sele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly A Paczolt, Adam G Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4430282?pdf=render
id doaj-a2a15765623a4df7848e468118d48855
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2a15765623a4df7848e468118d488552020-11-25T00:40:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012414710.1371/journal.pone.0124147The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.Kimberly A PaczoltAdam G JonesSyngnathid fishes (pipefishes, seahorses and seadragons) are characterized by a unique mode of paternal care in which embryos develop on or in the male's body, often within a structure known as a brood pouch. Evidence suggests that this pouch plays a role in mediating postcopulatory sexual selection and that males have some control over the events occurring within the pouch during the pregnancy. These observations lead to the prediction that males should invest differently in broods depending on the availability of food. Here, we use the Gulf pipefish to test this prediction by monitoring growth rate and offspring survivorship during the pregnancies of males under low- or high-food conditions. Our results show that pregnant males grow less rapidly on average than non-pregnant males, and pregnant males under low-food conditions grow less than pregnant males under high-food conditions. Offspring survivorship, on the other hand, does not differ between food treatments, suggesting that male Gulf pipefish sacrifice investment in somatic growth, and thus indirectly sacrifice future reproduction, in favor of current reproduction. However, a positive relationship between number of failed eggs and male growth rate in our low-food treatments suggests that undeveloped eggs reduce the pregnancy's overall cost to the male compared to broods containing only viable offspring.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4430282?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly A Paczolt
Adam G Jones
spellingShingle Kimberly A Paczolt
Adam G Jones
The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kimberly A Paczolt
Adam G Jones
author_sort Kimberly A Paczolt
title The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
title_short The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
title_full The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
title_fullStr The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
title_full_unstemmed The effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
title_sort effects of food limitation on life history tradeoffs in pregnant male gulf pipefish.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Syngnathid fishes (pipefishes, seahorses and seadragons) are characterized by a unique mode of paternal care in which embryos develop on or in the male's body, often within a structure known as a brood pouch. Evidence suggests that this pouch plays a role in mediating postcopulatory sexual selection and that males have some control over the events occurring within the pouch during the pregnancy. These observations lead to the prediction that males should invest differently in broods depending on the availability of food. Here, we use the Gulf pipefish to test this prediction by monitoring growth rate and offspring survivorship during the pregnancies of males under low- or high-food conditions. Our results show that pregnant males grow less rapidly on average than non-pregnant males, and pregnant males under low-food conditions grow less than pregnant males under high-food conditions. Offspring survivorship, on the other hand, does not differ between food treatments, suggesting that male Gulf pipefish sacrifice investment in somatic growth, and thus indirectly sacrifice future reproduction, in favor of current reproduction. However, a positive relationship between number of failed eggs and male growth rate in our low-food treatments suggests that undeveloped eggs reduce the pregnancy's overall cost to the male compared to broods containing only viable offspring.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4430282?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlyapaczolt theeffectsoffoodlimitationonlifehistorytradeoffsinpregnantmalegulfpipefish
AT adamgjones theeffectsoffoodlimitationonlifehistorytradeoffsinpregnantmalegulfpipefish
AT kimberlyapaczolt effectsoffoodlimitationonlifehistorytradeoffsinpregnantmalegulfpipefish
AT adamgjones effectsoffoodlimitationonlifehistorytradeoffsinpregnantmalegulfpipefish
_version_ 1725290802442141696