TREXIT Is Now: Should We Abandon the Transrectal Route for Biopsy? A Three-continent Debate—No
Main Authors: | Jonathan Olivier, Badrinath Konety, Dickon Hayne |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-09-01
|
Series: | European Urology Open Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168321001294 |
Similar Items
-
TREXIT Is Now: Should We Abandon the Transrectal Route for Biopsy? A Three-continent Debate—Referee
by: Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
TREXIT Is Now: Should We Abandon the Transrectal Route for Prostate Biopsy? Yes
by: Jeremy P. Grummet, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Road to Trexit: A territory-wide study on the predictors of 30-day complications in transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy
by: C.K. Chan, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Should we review our prophylaxis approaches in transrectal prostate biopsies due to increased antibiotic resistance?
by: A. Aypak, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
TREXIT: initial experience with transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting in South East Asia
by: Arianto Yuwono, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)