Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research has suggested that the silicon BD Atomic Edge™ knife has superior performance characteristics when compared to a metal knife and performance similar to diamond knife when making various incisions. This study was des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parvu Valentin, Dugue Geoffrey, Albanese John, Bajart Ann M, Lee Edwin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/9/15
id doaj-a26f16991eda43c3ac794ef7b965060c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a26f16991eda43c3ac794ef7b965060c2020-11-24T21:21:53ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152009-12-01911510.1186/1471-2415-9-15Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced usersParvu ValentinDugue GeoffreyAlbanese JohnBajart Ann MLee Edwin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research has suggested that the silicon BD Atomic Edge™ knife has superior performance characteristics when compared to a metal knife and performance similar to diamond knife when making various incisions. This study was designed to determine whether a silicon accurate depth knife has equivalent performance characteristics when compared to a diamond limbal relaxing incision (LRI) knife and superior performance characteristics when compared to a steel accurate depth knife when creating limbal relaxing incision.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixty-five ophthalmic surgeons with limbal relaxing incision experience created limbal relaxing incisions in <it>ex-vivo </it>porcine eyes with silicon and steel accurate depth knives and diamond LRI knives. The ophthalmic surgeons rated multiple performance characteristics of the knives on Visual Analog Scales.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The observed differences between the silicon knife and diamond knife were found to be insignificant. The mean ratio between the performance of the silicon knife and the diamond knife was shown to be greater than 90% (with 95% confidence). The silicon knife's mean performance was significantly higher than the performance of the steel knife for all characteristics. (<it>p</it>-value < .05)</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For experienced users, the silicon accurate depth knife was found to be equivalent in performance to the diamond LRI knife and superior to the steel accurate depth knife when making limbal relaxing incisions in <it>ex vivo </it>porcine eyes. Disposable silicon LRI knives may be an alternative to diamond LRI knives.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/9/15
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Parvu Valentin
Dugue Geoffrey
Albanese John
Bajart Ann M
Lee Edwin
spellingShingle Parvu Valentin
Dugue Geoffrey
Albanese John
Bajart Ann M
Lee Edwin
Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
BMC Ophthalmology
author_facet Parvu Valentin
Dugue Geoffrey
Albanese John
Bajart Ann M
Lee Edwin
author_sort Parvu Valentin
title Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
title_short Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
title_full Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
title_fullStr Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
title_sort evaluation of a new disposable silicon limbal relaxing incision knife by experienced users
publisher BMC
series BMC Ophthalmology
issn 1471-2415
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous research has suggested that the silicon BD Atomic Edge™ knife has superior performance characteristics when compared to a metal knife and performance similar to diamond knife when making various incisions. This study was designed to determine whether a silicon accurate depth knife has equivalent performance characteristics when compared to a diamond limbal relaxing incision (LRI) knife and superior performance characteristics when compared to a steel accurate depth knife when creating limbal relaxing incision.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixty-five ophthalmic surgeons with limbal relaxing incision experience created limbal relaxing incisions in <it>ex-vivo </it>porcine eyes with silicon and steel accurate depth knives and diamond LRI knives. The ophthalmic surgeons rated multiple performance characteristics of the knives on Visual Analog Scales.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The observed differences between the silicon knife and diamond knife were found to be insignificant. The mean ratio between the performance of the silicon knife and the diamond knife was shown to be greater than 90% (with 95% confidence). The silicon knife's mean performance was significantly higher than the performance of the steel knife for all characteristics. (<it>p</it>-value < .05)</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For experienced users, the silicon accurate depth knife was found to be equivalent in performance to the diamond LRI knife and superior to the steel accurate depth knife when making limbal relaxing incisions in <it>ex vivo </it>porcine eyes. Disposable silicon LRI knives may be an alternative to diamond LRI knives.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/9/15
work_keys_str_mv AT parvuvalentin evaluationofanewdisposablesiliconlimbalrelaxingincisionknifebyexperiencedusers
AT duguegeoffrey evaluationofanewdisposablesiliconlimbalrelaxingincisionknifebyexperiencedusers
AT albanesejohn evaluationofanewdisposablesiliconlimbalrelaxingincisionknifebyexperiencedusers
AT bajartannm evaluationofanewdisposablesiliconlimbalrelaxingincisionknifebyexperiencedusers
AT leeedwin evaluationofanewdisposablesiliconlimbalrelaxingincisionknifebyexperiencedusers
_version_ 1725997847467261952