Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice
Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted betw...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
|
Series: | Radiologia Brasileira |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016005001101&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-a269dfa45ad341139c0e7597d85e653c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a269dfa45ad341139c0e7597d85e653c2020-11-24T23:56:15ZengColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemRadiologia Brasileira1678-7099010.1590/0100-3984.2015.0108S0100-39842016005001101Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practiceAmanda Nogueira de Sá GonçalvesMarco Aurélio Sousa SalaRodrigo Ciotola BrunoJosé Alberto Cunha XavierJoão Mauricio Canavezi IndianiMarcelo Fontalvo MartinPaulo Maurício Chagas BrunoMarcelo Souto NacifAbstract Objective: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. Results: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). Conclusion: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016005001101&lng=en&tlng=enDefecographyConstipationRectoceleRectal prolapse |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves Marco Aurélio Sousa Sala Rodrigo Ciotola Bruno José Alberto Cunha Xavier João Mauricio Canavezi Indiani Marcelo Fontalvo Martin Paulo Maurício Chagas Bruno Marcelo Souto Nacif |
spellingShingle |
Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves Marco Aurélio Sousa Sala Rodrigo Ciotola Bruno José Alberto Cunha Xavier João Mauricio Canavezi Indiani Marcelo Fontalvo Martin Paulo Maurício Chagas Bruno Marcelo Souto Nacif Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice Radiologia Brasileira Defecography Constipation Rectocele Rectal prolapse |
author_facet |
Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves Marco Aurélio Sousa Sala Rodrigo Ciotola Bruno José Alberto Cunha Xavier João Mauricio Canavezi Indiani Marcelo Fontalvo Martin Paulo Maurício Chagas Bruno Marcelo Souto Nacif |
author_sort |
Amanda Nogueira de Sá Gonçalves |
title |
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title_short |
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title_full |
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title_fullStr |
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
title_sort |
defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice |
publisher |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
series |
Radiologia Brasileira |
issn |
1678-7099 |
description |
Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to profile patients who undergo defecography, by age and gender, as well as to describe the main imaging and diagnostic findings in this population. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive study of 39 patients, conducted between January 2012 and February 2014. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. They were stratified by age, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All possible quantitative defecography variables were evaluated, including rectal evacuation, perineal descent, and measures of the anal canal. Results: The majority (95%) of the patients were female. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 82 years (mean age, 52 ± 13 years): 10 patients were under 40 years of age; 18 were between 40 and 60 years of age; and 11 were over 60 years of age. All 39 of the patients evaluated had abnormal radiological findings. The most prevalent diagnoses were rectocele (in 77%) and enterocele (in 38%). Less prevalent diagnoses were vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and Meckel's diverticulum (in 2%, for all). Conclusion: Although defecography is performed more often in women, both genders can benefit from the test. Defecography can be performed in order to detect complex disorders such as uterine and rectal prolapse, as well as to detect basic clinical conditions such as rectocele or enterocele. |
topic |
Defecography Constipation Rectocele Rectal prolapse |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842016005001101&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandanogueiradesagoncalves defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT marcoaureliosousasala defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT rodrigociotolabruno defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT josealbertocunhaxavier defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT joaomauriciocanaveziindiani defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT marcelofontalvomartin defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT paulomauriciochagasbruno defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice AT marcelosoutonacif defecographybydigitalradiographyexperienceinclinicalpractice |
_version_ |
1725458804823293952 |