Dispersal strategies, few dominating or many coexisting: the effect of environmental spatial structure and multiple sources of mortality.
Interspecific competition, life history traits, environmental heterogeneity and spatial structure as well as disturbance are known to impact the successful dispersal strategies in metacommunities. However, studies on the direction of impact of those factors on dispersal have yielded contradictory re...
Main Authors: | Lucie Büchi, Séverine Vuilleumier |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3321035?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
If so many are "few", how few are "many"?
by: Stefan eHeim, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Saving Capitalism - For the Many, Not the Few
by: Enda Murphy
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Resource competition and coexistence in heterogeneous metacommunities: many-species coexistence is unlikely to be facilitated by spatial variation in resources
by: Donald R. Schoolmaster Jr
Published: (2013-08-01) -
ROMANIA: MANY ENTREPRENEURS BUT FEW INNOVATORS
by: Daniel Badulescu, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
So Many Are “Few,” but so Few Are Also “Few” – Reduced Semantic Flexibility in bvFTD Patients
by: Stefan Heim, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)