Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead u...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Company of Biologists
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Biology Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866 |
id |
doaj-a2581c5aaeb34b418f9a9923ddd9e25d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a2581c5aaeb34b418f9a9923ddd9e25d2021-06-02T19:00:36ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902020-06-019610.1242/bio.049866049866Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation studyLukas Landler0Graeme D. Ruxton1E. Pascal Malkemper2 Institute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK Max Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead uniformly distributed over the whole circle. The most common means of performing this type of investigation is with a Rayleigh test. An alternative might be to compare the fit of the uniform distribution model to alternative models. Such model-fitting approaches have become a standard technique with linear data, and their greater application to circular data has been recently advocated. Here we present simulation data that demonstrate that such model-based inference can offer very similar performance to the best traditional tests, but only if adjustment is made in order to control type I error rate.http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866circular statisticsaicrayleigh testhermans-rasson test |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lukas Landler Graeme D. Ruxton E. Pascal Malkemper |
spellingShingle |
Lukas Landler Graeme D. Ruxton E. Pascal Malkemper Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study Biology Open circular statistics aic rayleigh test hermans-rasson test |
author_facet |
Lukas Landler Graeme D. Ruxton E. Pascal Malkemper |
author_sort |
Lukas Landler |
title |
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
title_short |
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
title_full |
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
title_fullStr |
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
title_sort |
model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study |
publisher |
The Company of Biologists |
series |
Biology Open |
issn |
2046-6390 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead uniformly distributed over the whole circle. The most common means of performing this type of investigation is with a Rayleigh test. An alternative might be to compare the fit of the uniform distribution model to alternative models. Such model-fitting approaches have become a standard technique with linear data, and their greater application to circular data has been recently advocated. Here we present simulation data that demonstrate that such model-based inference can offer very similar performance to the best traditional tests, but only if adjustment is made in order to control type I error rate. |
topic |
circular statistics aic rayleigh test hermans-rasson test |
url |
http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lukaslandler modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy AT graemedruxton modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy AT epascalmalkemper modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy |
_version_ |
1721401978443005952 |