Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study

Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Landler, Graeme D. Ruxton, E. Pascal Malkemper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2020-06-01
Series:Biology Open
Subjects:
aic
Online Access:http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866
id doaj-a2581c5aaeb34b418f9a9923ddd9e25d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2581c5aaeb34b418f9a9923ddd9e25d2021-06-02T19:00:36ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902020-06-019610.1242/bio.049866049866Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation studyLukas Landler0Graeme D. Ruxton1E. Pascal Malkemper2 Institute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK Max Planck Research Group Neurobiology of Magnetoreception, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (caesar), Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead uniformly distributed over the whole circle. The most common means of performing this type of investigation is with a Rayleigh test. An alternative might be to compare the fit of the uniform distribution model to alternative models. Such model-fitting approaches have become a standard technique with linear data, and their greater application to circular data has been recently advocated. Here we present simulation data that demonstrate that such model-based inference can offer very similar performance to the best traditional tests, but only if adjustment is made in order to control type I error rate.http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866circular statisticsaicrayleigh testhermans-rasson test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lukas Landler
Graeme D. Ruxton
E. Pascal Malkemper
spellingShingle Lukas Landler
Graeme D. Ruxton
E. Pascal Malkemper
Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
Biology Open
circular statistics
aic
rayleigh test
hermans-rasson test
author_facet Lukas Landler
Graeme D. Ruxton
E. Pascal Malkemper
author_sort Lukas Landler
title Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
title_short Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
title_full Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
title_fullStr Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed Model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
title_sort model selection versus traditional hypothesis testing in circular statistics: a simulation study
publisher The Company of Biologists
series Biology Open
issn 2046-6390
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Many studies in biology involve data measured on a circular scale. Such data require different statistical treatment from those measured on linear scales. The most common statistical exploration of circular data involves testing the null hypothesis that the data show no aggregation and are instead uniformly distributed over the whole circle. The most common means of performing this type of investigation is with a Rayleigh test. An alternative might be to compare the fit of the uniform distribution model to alternative models. Such model-fitting approaches have become a standard technique with linear data, and their greater application to circular data has been recently advocated. Here we present simulation data that demonstrate that such model-based inference can offer very similar performance to the best traditional tests, but only if adjustment is made in order to control type I error rate.
topic circular statistics
aic
rayleigh test
hermans-rasson test
url http://bio.biologists.org/content/9/6/bio049866
work_keys_str_mv AT lukaslandler modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy
AT graemedruxton modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy
AT epascalmalkemper modelselectionversustraditionalhypothesistestingincircularstatisticsasimulationstudy
_version_ 1721401978443005952