Deconstruction of a Myth about ‘Capitaleness’: A Case of a Town Called Myshkin
Capital represents the most typical institutional body that determines the functions of a political center separating it from a “periphery” a historical memory of the previous “capitalness” has an impact on people’s identity even when a state has disappeared or is invented.
Main Author: | E. S. Okuneva |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Jurist, Publishing Group
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/349 |
Similar Items
-
Town’s Symbol in the Mind of its Residents as a Determinant of a Concept of ‘Capitalness’: The Cases of Kasimov and Myshkin
by: B. A. Barabash
Published: (2015-10-01) -
The Cases of Kasimov and Myshkin: How Spatial Identity Males Some Cities More Mteropolitan than Others
by: M. I. Tislenko
Published: (2015-10-01) -
CAPITAL WITHOUT STATEHOOD: EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN STARAYA LADOGA, KASIMOV AND MYSHKIN
by: I. Y. Okunev, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Information about XI conference "Rodents & Spatium" in Myshkin city (2008)
by: Zoya Selyunina
Published: (2010-12-01) -
‘Capitalness’ in the Mind of the Residents of Small Russian Towns: The Cases of Kasymov, Myshking and Old Ladoga
by: A. V. Salavatova
Published: (2015-10-01)