Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion

In this study, the influence of the open bath and closed-injection pultrusion (CIP) processing methods of epoxy resins on the quality of glass fiber composites was investigated. In addition to the state-of-the-art epoxy resin system with long pot life, new resin systems with short pot life have rece...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Strauß, Andreas Senz, Jessica Ellinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Journal of Composites Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/3/3/87
id doaj-a236fe3c6966451ba9c84f48138fb225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a236fe3c6966451ba9c84f48138fb2252020-11-25T01:34:01ZengMDPI AGJournal of Composites Science2504-477X2019-08-01338710.3390/jcs3030087jcs3030087Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection PultrusionSebastian Strauß0Andreas Senz1Jessica Ellinger2Fraunhofer IGCV, 86159 Augsburg, GermanyFraunhofer IGCV, 86159 Augsburg, GermanyFraunhofer IGCV, 86159 Augsburg, GermanyIn this study, the influence of the open bath and closed-injection pultrusion (CIP) processing methods of epoxy resins on the quality of glass fiber composites was investigated. In addition to the state-of-the-art epoxy resin system with long pot life, new resin systems with short pot life have recently been developed. These systems require processing by closed-injection pultrusion. The epoxies with long pot life allow both processing variants. The experimental work was carried out with two types of injection and impregnation chambers (ii_chamber), namely with a conical and a teardrop design. Fully impregnated composites, which were used for further analyses, could be produced by using the conical ii_chamber. The composite properties of the open bath and the conical ii_chamber impregnation methods were compared. No significant influence on the bending stress could be determined; the interlaminar shear strength was up to 10% better with open bath impregnation than with ii_chamber. For the composites investigated, it was shown that the open bath and ii_chamber impregnation methods can be used to produce parts with partially comparable properties, as demonstrated for the epoxy formulation with long pot life. These results indicate that processing of epoxy systems with a short pot life is also possible by closed-injection pultrusion. Furthermore, the influence on the composite properties of the time interval between the mixing of an epoxy resin and processing in an open bath was investigated. No significant effect on the bending stress and interlaminar shear strength could be determined.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/3/3/87pultrusionepoxyglass fibersthermosetclosed-injection pultrusionopen bath impregnation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Strauß
Andreas Senz
Jessica Ellinger
spellingShingle Sebastian Strauß
Andreas Senz
Jessica Ellinger
Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
Journal of Composites Science
pultrusion
epoxy
glass fibers
thermoset
closed-injection pultrusion
open bath impregnation
author_facet Sebastian Strauß
Andreas Senz
Jessica Ellinger
author_sort Sebastian Strauß
title Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
title_short Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
title_full Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
title_fullStr Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Processing of Epoxy Resins in Pultrusion with Open Bath Impregnation and Closed-Injection Pultrusion
title_sort comparison of the processing of epoxy resins in pultrusion with open bath impregnation and closed-injection pultrusion
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Composites Science
issn 2504-477X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description In this study, the influence of the open bath and closed-injection pultrusion (CIP) processing methods of epoxy resins on the quality of glass fiber composites was investigated. In addition to the state-of-the-art epoxy resin system with long pot life, new resin systems with short pot life have recently been developed. These systems require processing by closed-injection pultrusion. The epoxies with long pot life allow both processing variants. The experimental work was carried out with two types of injection and impregnation chambers (ii_chamber), namely with a conical and a teardrop design. Fully impregnated composites, which were used for further analyses, could be produced by using the conical ii_chamber. The composite properties of the open bath and the conical ii_chamber impregnation methods were compared. No significant influence on the bending stress could be determined; the interlaminar shear strength was up to 10% better with open bath impregnation than with ii_chamber. For the composites investigated, it was shown that the open bath and ii_chamber impregnation methods can be used to produce parts with partially comparable properties, as demonstrated for the epoxy formulation with long pot life. These results indicate that processing of epoxy systems with a short pot life is also possible by closed-injection pultrusion. Furthermore, the influence on the composite properties of the time interval between the mixing of an epoxy resin and processing in an open bath was investigated. No significant effect on the bending stress and interlaminar shear strength could be determined.
topic pultrusion
epoxy
glass fibers
thermoset
closed-injection pultrusion
open bath impregnation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-477X/3/3/87
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianstrauß comparisonoftheprocessingofepoxyresinsinpultrusionwithopenbathimpregnationandclosedinjectionpultrusion
AT andreassenz comparisonoftheprocessingofepoxyresinsinpultrusionwithopenbathimpregnationandclosedinjectionpultrusion
AT jessicaellinger comparisonoftheprocessingofepoxyresinsinpultrusionwithopenbathimpregnationandclosedinjectionpultrusion
_version_ 1725074160545169408