Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility

<p>This study develops the critical reflections of the activities for information, training and education that have been conducted by a group of researchers of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia in recent years. In particular, from an epistemological point of view, our analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Federica La Longa, Romano Camassi, Massimo Crescimbene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) 2012-07-01
Series:Annals of Geophysics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5525
id doaj-a22a60cde30b47c4a5a9b4d4f8db7427
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a22a60cde30b47c4a5a9b4d4f8db74272020-11-24T20:59:59ZengIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)Annals of Geophysics1593-52132037-416X2012-07-0155310.4401/ag-55255750Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibilityFederica La Longa0Romano Camassi1Massimo Crescimbene2Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, RomeIstituto Nazionale di Geofica e Vulcanologia, BolognaIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome<p>This study develops the critical reflections of the activities for information, training and education that have been conducted by a group of researchers of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia in recent years. In particular, from an epistemological point of view, our analysis involves: (i) science outreach, the link between science and the world; (ii) science teaching and its role in the contact between science and schools; and (iii) risk education, seen as a process that can develop a culture of risk in relation to the territory in which we live. These issues are critically analyzed on the basis of experience gained since 1995. The educational methodologies tested in ‘peacetime’ (in the absence of seismic events) with the EDURISK Project are compared with those experienced during an emergency in Abruzzo, Italy. Today, we increasingly refer to prevention as the primary strategy of defense against risk. However, very often the responsibility of prevention falls on others, such as the government, institutions and/or local authorities. The citizens then perceive themselves as powerless against the inevitability of natural events, and they refer to these ‘rulers’ for the implementation of effective prevention policies. So, as researchers, what are the most effective actions we can take to influence risk reduction and to motivate the choices of the people? Must the effectiveness of our interventions be based on scientific information or on specific training, or must it be reached through the development of values, actions and awareness? Must our interventions be oriented and developed to inform, to train or to educate?</p>http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5525Risk educationSeismic riskVolcanic risk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Federica La Longa
Romano Camassi
Massimo Crescimbene
spellingShingle Federica La Longa
Romano Camassi
Massimo Crescimbene
Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
Annals of Geophysics
Risk education
Seismic risk
Volcanic risk
author_facet Federica La Longa
Romano Camassi
Massimo Crescimbene
author_sort Federica La Longa
title Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
title_short Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
title_full Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
title_fullStr Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
title_full_unstemmed Educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
title_sort educational strategies to reduce risk: a choice of social responsibility
publisher Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
series Annals of Geophysics
issn 1593-5213
2037-416X
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>This study develops the critical reflections of the activities for information, training and education that have been conducted by a group of researchers of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia in recent years. In particular, from an epistemological point of view, our analysis involves: (i) science outreach, the link between science and the world; (ii) science teaching and its role in the contact between science and schools; and (iii) risk education, seen as a process that can develop a culture of risk in relation to the territory in which we live. These issues are critically analyzed on the basis of experience gained since 1995. The educational methodologies tested in ‘peacetime’ (in the absence of seismic events) with the EDURISK Project are compared with those experienced during an emergency in Abruzzo, Italy. Today, we increasingly refer to prevention as the primary strategy of defense against risk. However, very often the responsibility of prevention falls on others, such as the government, institutions and/or local authorities. The citizens then perceive themselves as powerless against the inevitability of natural events, and they refer to these ‘rulers’ for the implementation of effective prevention policies. So, as researchers, what are the most effective actions we can take to influence risk reduction and to motivate the choices of the people? Must the effectiveness of our interventions be based on scientific information or on specific training, or must it be reached through the development of values, actions and awareness? Must our interventions be oriented and developed to inform, to train or to educate?</p>
topic Risk education
Seismic risk
Volcanic risk
url http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5525
work_keys_str_mv AT federicalalonga educationalstrategiestoreduceriskachoiceofsocialresponsibility
AT romanocamassi educationalstrategiestoreduceriskachoiceofsocialresponsibility
AT massimocrescimbene educationalstrategiestoreduceriskachoiceofsocialresponsibility
_version_ 1716780718382645248