Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review

Aims: We attempt to review the conceptualisation, science and classification of biomes and propose to limit the definition of a biome to potential natural vegetation as determined by general environmental variables. Results: Classifying the distribution and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Hunter, Scott Franklin, Sarah Luxton, Javier Loidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2021-06-01
Series:Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)
Online Access:https://vcs.pensoft.net/article/61463/download/pdf/
id doaj-a21e0727b887432a9d2473ac64d193ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a21e0727b887432a9d2473ac64d193ca2021-06-30T12:09:44ZengPensoft PublishersVegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)2683-06712021-06-012738510.3897/VCS/2021/6146361463Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual reviewJohn Hunter0Scott Franklin1Sarah Luxton2Javier Loidi3University of New EnglandUniversity of Northern ColoradoNorthern Territory GovernmentUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Aims: We attempt to review the conceptualisation, science and classification of biomes and propose to limit the definition of a biome to potential natural vegetation as determined by general environmental variables. Results: Classifying the distribution and abundance of vegetation types on earth has been a central tenet of vegetation science since Humboldt’s classic studies in the early 1800s. While the importance of such classifications only grows in the wake of extreme changes, this review demonstrates that there are many fundamentally different approaches to define biomes, hitherto with limited efforts for unifying concepts among disciplines. Consequently, there is little congruence between the resulting maps, and widely used biome maps fail to delimit areas with consistent climate profiles. Conclusions: Gaps of knowledge are directly related to research avenues, and suggestions for defining and classifying biomes, as well as modelling their distributions, are provided. These suggestions highlight the primary importance of the climate, argue against using anthropogenic drivers to define biomes and stabilize the concept of biome to escape from the current polysemy. The last two decades have seen an emergence of new approaches, e.g., using satellite imagery to determine growth patterns of vegetation, leading to defining biomes based on the objective, observable qualities of the vegetation based on current reality. https://vcs.pensoft.net/article/61463/download/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Hunter
Scott Franklin
Sarah Luxton
Javier Loidi
spellingShingle John Hunter
Scott Franklin
Sarah Luxton
Javier Loidi
Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)
author_facet John Hunter
Scott Franklin
Sarah Luxton
Javier Loidi
author_sort John Hunter
title Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
title_short Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
title_full Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
title_fullStr Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
title_full_unstemmed Terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
title_sort terrestrial biomes: a conceptual review
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Vegetation Classification and Survey (VCS)
issn 2683-0671
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Aims: We attempt to review the conceptualisation, science and classification of biomes and propose to limit the definition of a biome to potential natural vegetation as determined by general environmental variables. Results: Classifying the distribution and abundance of vegetation types on earth has been a central tenet of vegetation science since Humboldt’s classic studies in the early 1800s. While the importance of such classifications only grows in the wake of extreme changes, this review demonstrates that there are many fundamentally different approaches to define biomes, hitherto with limited efforts for unifying concepts among disciplines. Consequently, there is little congruence between the resulting maps, and widely used biome maps fail to delimit areas with consistent climate profiles. Conclusions: Gaps of knowledge are directly related to research avenues, and suggestions for defining and classifying biomes, as well as modelling their distributions, are provided. These suggestions highlight the primary importance of the climate, argue against using anthropogenic drivers to define biomes and stabilize the concept of biome to escape from the current polysemy. The last two decades have seen an emergence of new approaches, e.g., using satellite imagery to determine growth patterns of vegetation, leading to defining biomes based on the objective, observable qualities of the vegetation based on current reality.
url https://vcs.pensoft.net/article/61463/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhunter terrestrialbiomesaconceptualreview
AT scottfranklin terrestrialbiomesaconceptualreview
AT sarahluxton terrestrialbiomesaconceptualreview
AT javierloidi terrestrialbiomesaconceptualreview
_version_ 1721353050383187968