The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute

Abstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yusuke Naito, Mitsuru Ida, Ryo Yamamoto, Kazuya Tachibana, Keiko Kinouchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-06-01
Series:JA Clinical Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z
id doaj-a21c89cb30f948d59b7c664220f048cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a21c89cb30f948d59b7c664220f048cf2021-04-02T14:22:19ZengSpringerOpenJA Clinical Reports2363-90242019-06-01511710.1186/s40981-019-0260-zThe effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese instituteYusuke Naito0Mitsuru Ida1Ryo Yamamoto2Kazuya Tachibana3Keiko Kinouchi4Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalAbstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study whether LEA would affect the course of labor in our institute. Methods Delivery records from October 2013 to April 2016 were collected. Deliveries at gestational age < 36 weeks and multiple pregnancies were excluded. All cases were divided into the non-epidural labor (NEL) group or the epidural labor (EL) group. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to balance intergroup differences. Our primary outcome was a mode of delivery (spontaneous, assisted vaginal, cesarean). Secondary outcomes were lengths of labor and outcomes of the neonates. Results During the study period, 2632 cases met the inclusion criteria. All analyses were performed after propensity score matching (218 pairs). The percentage of assisted vaginal delivery increased by the use of LEA (11.5% in NEL group vs 25.7% in EL group; p < 0.001), but the rate of cesarean section was similar (12.8% vs 17.0%; p = 0.23). The durations of the first and second stages of labor were prolonged by the use of LEA in both primipara and multipara women. Outcomes of the neonates were similar in both groups. Conclusion Use of LEA did not increase the rate of cesarean section when analyzed by propensity score-matched analysis in our institute.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-zEpidural laborCesarean sectionLaborAssisted vaginal deliveryPropensity score-matched analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yusuke Naito
Mitsuru Ida
Ryo Yamamoto
Kazuya Tachibana
Keiko Kinouchi
spellingShingle Yusuke Naito
Mitsuru Ida
Ryo Yamamoto
Kazuya Tachibana
Keiko Kinouchi
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
JA Clinical Reports
Epidural labor
Cesarean section
Labor
Assisted vaginal delivery
Propensity score-matched analysis
author_facet Yusuke Naito
Mitsuru Ida
Ryo Yamamoto
Kazuya Tachibana
Keiko Kinouchi
author_sort Yusuke Naito
title The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
title_short The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
title_full The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
title_fullStr The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
title_full_unstemmed The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
title_sort effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single japanese institute
publisher SpringerOpen
series JA Clinical Reports
issn 2363-9024
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study whether LEA would affect the course of labor in our institute. Methods Delivery records from October 2013 to April 2016 were collected. Deliveries at gestational age < 36 weeks and multiple pregnancies were excluded. All cases were divided into the non-epidural labor (NEL) group or the epidural labor (EL) group. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to balance intergroup differences. Our primary outcome was a mode of delivery (spontaneous, assisted vaginal, cesarean). Secondary outcomes were lengths of labor and outcomes of the neonates. Results During the study period, 2632 cases met the inclusion criteria. All analyses were performed after propensity score matching (218 pairs). The percentage of assisted vaginal delivery increased by the use of LEA (11.5% in NEL group vs 25.7% in EL group; p < 0.001), but the rate of cesarean section was similar (12.8% vs 17.0%; p = 0.23). The durations of the first and second stages of labor were prolonged by the use of LEA in both primipara and multipara women. Outcomes of the neonates were similar in both groups. Conclusion Use of LEA did not increase the rate of cesarean section when analyzed by propensity score-matched analysis in our institute.
topic Epidural labor
Cesarean section
Labor
Assisted vaginal delivery
Propensity score-matched analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yusukenaito theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT mitsuruida theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT ryoyamamoto theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT kazuyatachibana theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT keikokinouchi theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT yusukenaito effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT mitsuruida effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT ryoyamamoto effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT kazuyatachibana effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
AT keikokinouchi effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute
_version_ 1721562461059940352