The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute
Abstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-06-01
|
Series: | JA Clinical Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z |
id |
doaj-a21c89cb30f948d59b7c664220f048cf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a21c89cb30f948d59b7c664220f048cf2021-04-02T14:22:19ZengSpringerOpenJA Clinical Reports2363-90242019-06-01511710.1186/s40981-019-0260-zThe effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese instituteYusuke Naito0Mitsuru Ida1Ryo Yamamoto2Kazuya Tachibana3Keiko Kinouchi4Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women’s and Children’s HospitalAbstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study whether LEA would affect the course of labor in our institute. Methods Delivery records from October 2013 to April 2016 were collected. Deliveries at gestational age < 36 weeks and multiple pregnancies were excluded. All cases were divided into the non-epidural labor (NEL) group or the epidural labor (EL) group. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to balance intergroup differences. Our primary outcome was a mode of delivery (spontaneous, assisted vaginal, cesarean). Secondary outcomes were lengths of labor and outcomes of the neonates. Results During the study period, 2632 cases met the inclusion criteria. All analyses were performed after propensity score matching (218 pairs). The percentage of assisted vaginal delivery increased by the use of LEA (11.5% in NEL group vs 25.7% in EL group; p < 0.001), but the rate of cesarean section was similar (12.8% vs 17.0%; p = 0.23). The durations of the first and second stages of labor were prolonged by the use of LEA in both primipara and multipara women. Outcomes of the neonates were similar in both groups. Conclusion Use of LEA did not increase the rate of cesarean section when analyzed by propensity score-matched analysis in our institute.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-zEpidural laborCesarean sectionLaborAssisted vaginal deliveryPropensity score-matched analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yusuke Naito Mitsuru Ida Ryo Yamamoto Kazuya Tachibana Keiko Kinouchi |
spellingShingle |
Yusuke Naito Mitsuru Ida Ryo Yamamoto Kazuya Tachibana Keiko Kinouchi The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute JA Clinical Reports Epidural labor Cesarean section Labor Assisted vaginal delivery Propensity score-matched analysis |
author_facet |
Yusuke Naito Mitsuru Ida Ryo Yamamoto Kazuya Tachibana Keiko Kinouchi |
author_sort |
Yusuke Naito |
title |
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute |
title_short |
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute |
title_full |
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute |
title_fullStr |
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute |
title_sort |
effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single japanese institute |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
JA Clinical Reports |
issn |
2363-9024 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Purpose Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) is the most widely used method in reducing labor pain. Previous RCTs have shown that LEA does not increase cesarean section rates; however, the results are inconsistent and may vary depending on the different backgrounds. Therefore, we aimed to study whether LEA would affect the course of labor in our institute. Methods Delivery records from October 2013 to April 2016 were collected. Deliveries at gestational age < 36 weeks and multiple pregnancies were excluded. All cases were divided into the non-epidural labor (NEL) group or the epidural labor (EL) group. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to balance intergroup differences. Our primary outcome was a mode of delivery (spontaneous, assisted vaginal, cesarean). Secondary outcomes were lengths of labor and outcomes of the neonates. Results During the study period, 2632 cases met the inclusion criteria. All analyses were performed after propensity score matching (218 pairs). The percentage of assisted vaginal delivery increased by the use of LEA (11.5% in NEL group vs 25.7% in EL group; p < 0.001), but the rate of cesarean section was similar (12.8% vs 17.0%; p = 0.23). The durations of the first and second stages of labor were prolonged by the use of LEA in both primipara and multipara women. Outcomes of the neonates were similar in both groups. Conclusion Use of LEA did not increase the rate of cesarean section when analyzed by propensity score-matched analysis in our institute. |
topic |
Epidural labor Cesarean section Labor Assisted vaginal delivery Propensity score-matched analysis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yusukenaito theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT mitsuruida theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT ryoyamamoto theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT kazuyatachibana theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT keikokinouchi theeffectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT yusukenaito effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT mitsuruida effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT ryoyamamoto effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT kazuyatachibana effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute AT keikokinouchi effectoflaborepiduralanalgesiaonlabordeliveryandneonataloutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysisinasinglejapaneseinstitute |
_version_ |
1721562461059940352 |