Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors.
OBJECTIVE:One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 |
id |
doaj-a213f39a61354b49a1f9fff5819863b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a213f39a61354b49a1f9fff5819863b42021-03-03T21:24:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022800910.1371/journal.pone.0228009Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors.Ali RashidiI Erol SandalciogluMichael LuchtmannOBJECTIVE:One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS:In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS:ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION:The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ali Rashidi I Erol Sandalcioglu Michael Luchtmann |
spellingShingle |
Ali Rashidi I Erol Sandalcioglu Michael Luchtmann Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Ali Rashidi I Erol Sandalcioglu Michael Luchtmann |
author_sort |
Ali Rashidi |
title |
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
title_short |
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
title_full |
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
title_fullStr |
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
title_sort |
aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVE:One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS:In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS:ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION:The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alirashidi asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors AT ierolsandalcioglu asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors AT michaelluchtmann asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors |
_version_ |
1714817002090004480 |