Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be beneficial for diagnosis of disease by offering quantitative information. However, reproducibility can be a major problem when there is a numerical threshold in multi-institution, multi-vendor situations. Purpose To measure pulmonary blood flow with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rin Iraha, Nanae Tsuchiya, Tsuneo Yamashiro, Tae Iwasawa, Sadayuki Murayama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:Acta Radiologica Open
Online Access:http://arr.sagepub.com/content/6/1/2058460116684370.full.pdf
id doaj-a208a71f24f3464b902fd554ccf94ee9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a208a71f24f3464b902fd554ccf94ee92020-11-25T03:38:47ZengSAGE PublishingActa Radiologica Open2058-46012017-01-016110.1177/205846011668437010.1177_2058460116684370Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutionsRin IrahaNanae TsuchiyaTsuneo YamashiroTae IwasawaSadayuki MurayamaBackground Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be beneficial for diagnosis of disease by offering quantitative information. However, reproducibility can be a major problem when there is a numerical threshold in multi-institution, multi-vendor situations. Purpose To measure pulmonary blood flow with phase-contrast (PC) imaging using two different MR scanners (1.5 T) at different institutions in the same participants and to examine the reproducibility of the measurements. Material and Methods Participants were 10 healthy volunteers (5 men; age range, 27–36 years). The measurements included the mean and maximal blood velocities, the mean blood flow volume, and the acceleration time and volume (AT and AV), derived from the time-flow curve of the PC-MRI. Simultaneously obtained maximal, minimal, and mean areas from regions of interest set in the pulmonary artery were also calculated. In order to calculate the reproducibility of the quantitative variables, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were employed. When an adequate ICC was obtained, Bland–Altman analysis was conducted to identify any systematic bias. Results The ICCs were almost perfect for the mean blood flow volume and the AV (r = 0.82 and 0.80), and were substantial in the mean and maximal areas, and the AT (r = 0.63, 0.74, and 0.64, respectively). However, there was a fixed bias in the area measurement between the two scanners. Also, the AV had a proportional bias. Conclusion Our results reveal that various indices derived from PC-MRI on different MR scanners are promising as common indices for pulmonary flow assessment. Research and clinical use of PC-MRI for the pulmonary artery is expected to extend to multi-institution situations.http://arr.sagepub.com/content/6/1/2058460116684370.full.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rin Iraha
Nanae Tsuchiya
Tsuneo Yamashiro
Tae Iwasawa
Sadayuki Murayama
spellingShingle Rin Iraha
Nanae Tsuchiya
Tsuneo Yamashiro
Tae Iwasawa
Sadayuki Murayama
Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
Acta Radiologica Open
author_facet Rin Iraha
Nanae Tsuchiya
Tsuneo Yamashiro
Tae Iwasawa
Sadayuki Murayama
author_sort Rin Iraha
title Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
title_short Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
title_full Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
title_fullStr Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast MRI using different 1.5 T MR scanners at two institutions
title_sort reproducibility of pulmonary blood flow measurements by phase-contrast mri using different 1.5 t mr scanners at two institutions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Acta Radiologica Open
issn 2058-4601
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be beneficial for diagnosis of disease by offering quantitative information. However, reproducibility can be a major problem when there is a numerical threshold in multi-institution, multi-vendor situations. Purpose To measure pulmonary blood flow with phase-contrast (PC) imaging using two different MR scanners (1.5 T) at different institutions in the same participants and to examine the reproducibility of the measurements. Material and Methods Participants were 10 healthy volunteers (5 men; age range, 27–36 years). The measurements included the mean and maximal blood velocities, the mean blood flow volume, and the acceleration time and volume (AT and AV), derived from the time-flow curve of the PC-MRI. Simultaneously obtained maximal, minimal, and mean areas from regions of interest set in the pulmonary artery were also calculated. In order to calculate the reproducibility of the quantitative variables, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were employed. When an adequate ICC was obtained, Bland–Altman analysis was conducted to identify any systematic bias. Results The ICCs were almost perfect for the mean blood flow volume and the AV (r = 0.82 and 0.80), and were substantial in the mean and maximal areas, and the AT (r = 0.63, 0.74, and 0.64, respectively). However, there was a fixed bias in the area measurement between the two scanners. Also, the AV had a proportional bias. Conclusion Our results reveal that various indices derived from PC-MRI on different MR scanners are promising as common indices for pulmonary flow assessment. Research and clinical use of PC-MRI for the pulmonary artery is expected to extend to multi-institution situations.
url http://arr.sagepub.com/content/6/1/2058460116684370.full.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT riniraha reproducibilityofpulmonarybloodflowmeasurementsbyphasecontrastmriusingdifferent15tmrscannersattwoinstitutions
AT nanaetsuchiya reproducibilityofpulmonarybloodflowmeasurementsbyphasecontrastmriusingdifferent15tmrscannersattwoinstitutions
AT tsuneoyamashiro reproducibilityofpulmonarybloodflowmeasurementsbyphasecontrastmriusingdifferent15tmrscannersattwoinstitutions
AT taeiwasawa reproducibilityofpulmonarybloodflowmeasurementsbyphasecontrastmriusingdifferent15tmrscannersattwoinstitutions
AT sadayukimurayama reproducibilityofpulmonarybloodflowmeasurementsbyphasecontrastmriusingdifferent15tmrscannersattwoinstitutions
_version_ 1724540531725303808