Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice

Translating the attractive concept of collaborative adaptive management (CAM) into practice has proven very difficult. The papers included in this Special Feature explore why this is true and suggest how the challenges might be addressed. This summary highlights common themes, major challenges, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kathi K. Beratan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss1/art46/
id doaj-a2075e04475245c39a7e20a638c9033b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a2075e04475245c39a7e20a638c9033b2020-11-24T22:39:11ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-03-011914610.5751/ES-06399-1901466399Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to PracticeKathi K. Beratan0North Carolina State UniversityTranslating the attractive concept of collaborative adaptive management (CAM) into practice has proven very difficult. The papers included in this Special Feature explore why this is true and suggest how the challenges might be addressed. This summary highlights common themes, major challenges, and implications for research and practice. Many of the included papers emphasize the central importance of collaboration and stakeholder engagement as a response to complexity and uncertainty. Collectively, the papers make the case that a lack of knowledge about how to manage the human dynamics of comanagement poses a major challenge to implementing CAM. Human activities are the primary drivers of system change in most natural resource management systems, so attention to human dynamics is essential for developing useful change hypotheses and leading indicators that can provide useful and timely feedback for adaptive management. Institutions need to evolve to support adaptive and collaborative management processes. This will require thoughtful design of CAM processes, along with commitment of sufficient time and resources. Implementation challenges should be considered as a major focus for research rather than as simply barriers to progress. More effective ways of capturing practitioners' experiential knowledge are required to improve the practice of CAM. This Special Feature suggests that the concept of a CAM practitioners' journal has promise, but realization of that promise will require careful attention to the needs of and constraints on practitioners.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss1/art46/collaborative adaptive managementinstitutional changeleading indicatorsprocess designstakeholder participation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathi K. Beratan
spellingShingle Kathi K. Beratan
Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
Ecology and Society
collaborative adaptive management
institutional change
leading indicators
process design
stakeholder participation
author_facet Kathi K. Beratan
author_sort Kathi K. Beratan
title Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
title_short Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
title_full Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
title_fullStr Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
title_full_unstemmed Summary: Addressing the Interactional Challenges of Moving Collaborative Adaptive Management From Theory to Practice
title_sort summary: addressing the interactional challenges of moving collaborative adaptive management from theory to practice
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Translating the attractive concept of collaborative adaptive management (CAM) into practice has proven very difficult. The papers included in this Special Feature explore why this is true and suggest how the challenges might be addressed. This summary highlights common themes, major challenges, and implications for research and practice. Many of the included papers emphasize the central importance of collaboration and stakeholder engagement as a response to complexity and uncertainty. Collectively, the papers make the case that a lack of knowledge about how to manage the human dynamics of comanagement poses a major challenge to implementing CAM. Human activities are the primary drivers of system change in most natural resource management systems, so attention to human dynamics is essential for developing useful change hypotheses and leading indicators that can provide useful and timely feedback for adaptive management. Institutions need to evolve to support adaptive and collaborative management processes. This will require thoughtful design of CAM processes, along with commitment of sufficient time and resources. Implementation challenges should be considered as a major focus for research rather than as simply barriers to progress. More effective ways of capturing practitioners' experiential knowledge are required to improve the practice of CAM. This Special Feature suggests that the concept of a CAM practitioners' journal has promise, but realization of that promise will require careful attention to the needs of and constraints on practitioners.
topic collaborative adaptive management
institutional change
leading indicators
process design
stakeholder participation
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss1/art46/
work_keys_str_mv AT kathikberatan summaryaddressingtheinteractionalchallengesofmovingcollaborativeadaptivemanagementfromtheorytopractice
_version_ 1716488560916299776