Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management

Physical Asset Management (PAM) initiatives suffer many barriers in implementation that can hinder their influence and sustainability. One of these barriers is the lack of buy-in from all levels in the organisation, due to a lack of understanding of the perceived benefits of PAM. Organisational alig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Von Petersdorff, Hagen, Vlok, Pieter-Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stellenbosch University 2014-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/755
id doaj-a1f8d95fb37a411c99e4bb8965370fd9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1f8d95fb37a411c99e4bb8965370fd92020-11-25T00:24:13ZengStellenbosch UniversitySouth African Journal of Industrial Engineering1012-277X2224-78902014-11-0125315416810.7166/25-3-755Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset managementVon Petersdorff, Hagen0Vlok, Pieter-Jan1Stellenbosch UniversityStellenbosch UniversityPhysical Asset Management (PAM) initiatives suffer many barriers in implementation that can hinder their influence and sustainability. One of these barriers is the lack of buy-in from all levels in the organisation, due to a lack of understanding of the perceived benefits of PAM. Organisational alignment in a PAM project is achieved by aligning employees’ views on the deficient areas in the organisation, and managing their expectations of the perceived benefits of a good application of PAM. Barriers in implementation are created, however, by the lack of a transparent method for conveying the significance of critical areas in the system and by an unclear way of communicating these problems. Typically these initiatives are constrained by available resources. In order for PAM initiatives to be successful, there first needs to be an alignment in the execution through a clear understanding of which assets are critical, so that resources can be allocated effectively. In this study, this problem is thoroughly examined, and a method is sought that seeks to isolate the effects of the maintenance function in an operation and to uncover critical areas. A study is performed on the methods that are typically used to create such understanding. This study highlights the shortcomings of these methods, which limit their applicability. A new methodology is therefore created in order to overcome these problems. The methodology is validated through a case study, where it shown to be highly beneficial in uncovering critical areas and achieving organisational alignment through the communication of results. http://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/755physical asset managementiso 55000simulationmaintenancesensitivity analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Von Petersdorff, Hagen
Vlok, Pieter-Jan
spellingShingle Von Petersdorff, Hagen
Vlok, Pieter-Jan
Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
physical asset management
iso 55000
simulation
maintenance
sensitivity analysis
author_facet Von Petersdorff, Hagen
Vlok, Pieter-Jan
author_sort Von Petersdorff, Hagen
title Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
title_short Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
title_full Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
title_fullStr Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
title_full_unstemmed Prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
title_sort prioritising maintenance improvement opportunities in physical asset management
publisher Stellenbosch University
series South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
issn 1012-277X
2224-7890
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Physical Asset Management (PAM) initiatives suffer many barriers in implementation that can hinder their influence and sustainability. One of these barriers is the lack of buy-in from all levels in the organisation, due to a lack of understanding of the perceived benefits of PAM. Organisational alignment in a PAM project is achieved by aligning employees’ views on the deficient areas in the organisation, and managing their expectations of the perceived benefits of a good application of PAM. Barriers in implementation are created, however, by the lack of a transparent method for conveying the significance of critical areas in the system and by an unclear way of communicating these problems. Typically these initiatives are constrained by available resources. In order for PAM initiatives to be successful, there first needs to be an alignment in the execution through a clear understanding of which assets are critical, so that resources can be allocated effectively. In this study, this problem is thoroughly examined, and a method is sought that seeks to isolate the effects of the maintenance function in an operation and to uncover critical areas. A study is performed on the methods that are typically used to create such understanding. This study highlights the shortcomings of these methods, which limit their applicability. A new methodology is therefore created in order to overcome these problems. The methodology is validated through a case study, where it shown to be highly beneficial in uncovering critical areas and achieving organisational alignment through the communication of results.
topic physical asset management
iso 55000
simulation
maintenance
sensitivity analysis
url http://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/755
work_keys_str_mv AT vonpetersdorffhagen prioritisingmaintenanceimprovementopportunitiesinphysicalassetmanagement
AT vlokpieterjan prioritisingmaintenanceimprovementopportunitiesinphysicalassetmanagement
_version_ 1725353308601712640