A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS

Language cannot be separated from the social context and culture. In everyday communication, people act and react differently depending on interactants, topics involved, and means of communication. This study, therefore, analyses two Talk Shows with guests of different power status- Ellen with Vice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ae Mon Kyaw, Xin Zhiying, Vincent Mbahawa Chefor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU) 2020-06-01
Series:Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching
Online Access:https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/languageliteracy/article/view/1839
id doaj-a1e860bcafe54b09a3d31b7a25179ad7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1e860bcafe54b09a3d31b7a25179ad72021-09-02T20:26:04ZengFakultas Sastra, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching2580-86722580-99622020-06-0141384610.30743/ll.v4i1.18391568A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUSAe Mon Kyaw0Xin Zhiying1Vincent Mbahawa Chefor2Xiamen UniversityXiamen UniversityXiamen University, ChinaLanguage cannot be separated from the social context and culture. In everyday communication, people act and react differently depending on interactants, topics involved, and means of communication. This study, therefore, analyses two Talk Shows with guests of different power status- Ellen with Vice President Joe Biden and Ellen with Special Education teacher Jenna Albi. The analysis is carried out using Halliday’s Mood analysis framework, as revised by Matthiessen (2014) and Eggin (2004). The present study compares Ellen’s use of Mood structures and their functions in the interaction with different social beings. It reveals that in the talk with the Vice President, Ellen uses questions most (28.37%), followed by statements (20%)  while in the talk with the Special Education teacher, Ellen prioritizes statements (43%) over questions (14%). On the other hand, she does not enjoy any Commands (0%) in the talk with the Vice President but does so with the teacher (18%). It turns out that, unlike in Fairclough’s (2001) finding, participants with high power status tend to answer questions rather than asking questions.https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/languageliteracy/article/view/1839
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ae Mon Kyaw
Xin Zhiying
Vincent Mbahawa Chefor
spellingShingle Ae Mon Kyaw
Xin Zhiying
Vincent Mbahawa Chefor
A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching
author_facet Ae Mon Kyaw
Xin Zhiying
Vincent Mbahawa Chefor
author_sort Ae Mon Kyaw
title A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
title_short A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
title_full A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
title_fullStr A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARISON OF MOOD STRUCTURES IN TWO TV TALK SHOWS WITH GUESTS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL STATUS
title_sort comparison of mood structures in two tv talk shows with guests of different social status
publisher Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara (UISU)
series Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching
issn 2580-8672
2580-9962
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Language cannot be separated from the social context and culture. In everyday communication, people act and react differently depending on interactants, topics involved, and means of communication. This study, therefore, analyses two Talk Shows with guests of different power status- Ellen with Vice President Joe Biden and Ellen with Special Education teacher Jenna Albi. The analysis is carried out using Halliday’s Mood analysis framework, as revised by Matthiessen (2014) and Eggin (2004). The present study compares Ellen’s use of Mood structures and their functions in the interaction with different social beings. It reveals that in the talk with the Vice President, Ellen uses questions most (28.37%), followed by statements (20%)  while in the talk with the Special Education teacher, Ellen prioritizes statements (43%) over questions (14%). On the other hand, she does not enjoy any Commands (0%) in the talk with the Vice President but does so with the teacher (18%). It turns out that, unlike in Fairclough’s (2001) finding, participants with high power status tend to answer questions rather than asking questions.
url https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/languageliteracy/article/view/1839
work_keys_str_mv AT aemonkyaw acomparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
AT xinzhiying acomparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
AT vincentmbahawachefor acomparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
AT aemonkyaw comparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
AT xinzhiying comparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
AT vincentmbahawachefor comparisonofmoodstructuresintwotvtalkshowswithguestsofdifferentsocialstatus
_version_ 1721170163525484544