Top-down estimates of European CH₄ and N₂O emissions based on four different inverse models

• Main Authors: P. Bergamaschi, M. Corazza, U. Karstens, M. Athanassiadou, R. L. Thompson, I. Pison, A. J. Manning, P. Bousquet, A. Segers, A. T. Vermeulen, G. Janssens-Maenhout, M. Schmidt, M. Ramonet, F. Meinhardt, T. Aalto, L. Haszpra, J. Moncrieff, M. E. Popa, D. Lowry, M. Steinbacher, A. Jordan, S. O'Doherty, S. Piacentino, E. Dlugokencky
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-01-01
• Series: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Online Access: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/715/2015/acp-15-715-2015.pdf

European CH₄ and N₂O emissions are estimated for 2006 and 2007 using four inverse modelling systems, based on different global and regional Eulerian and Lagrangian transport models. This ensemble approach is designed to provide more realistic estimates of the overall uncertainties in the derived emissions, which is particularly important for verifying bottom-up emission inventories. <br><br> We use continuous observations from 10 European stations (including 5 tall towers) for CH₄ and 9 continuous stations for N₂O, complemented by additional European and global discrete air sampling sites. The available observations mainly constrain CH₄ and N₂O emissions from north-western and eastern Europe. The inversions are strongly driven by the observations and the derived total emissions of larger countries show little dependence on the emission inventories used a priori. <br><br> Three inverse models yield 26–56% higher total CH₄ emissions from north-western and eastern Europe compared to bottom-up emissions reported to the UNFCCC, while one model is close to the UNFCCC values. In contrast, the inverse modelling estimates of European N₂O emissions are in general close to the UNFCCC values, with the overall range from all models being much smaller than the UNFCCC uncertainty range for most countries. Our analysis suggests that the reported uncertainties for CH₄ emissions might be underestimated, while those for N₂O emissions are likely overestimated.