Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.

<h4>Background</h4>The female condom is the only female-initiated form of protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs). However, use of this method in Australia is low. To better understand women's views and experiences of the female condom, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah E Fenwick, Jessica R Botfield, Prudence Kidman, Kevin McGeechan, Deborah Bateson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246664
id doaj-a1d359cff03543f69017217246baa4ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1d359cff03543f69017217246baa4ed2021-08-13T04:31:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024666410.1371/journal.pone.0246664Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.Sarah E FenwickJessica R BotfieldPrudence KidmanKevin McGeechanDeborah Bateson<h4>Background</h4>The female condom is the only female-initiated form of protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs). However, use of this method in Australia is low. To better understand women's views and experiences of the female condom, we conducted an interventional cross-sectional study.<h4>Methods</h4>Cisgender women ≥16 years, heterosexually active and living in New South Wales were recruited through social media advertisements and email invitations to clients of a family planning service. Eligible participants were provided with three female condoms and invited to complete a follow-up survey. Survey responses for women who attempted to use at least one female condom were summarised using counts and proportions.<h4>Results</h4>We recruited 556 women; few (30/556) had used the female condom before the study. There were 284 women who used, or attempted to use, a female condom during the study and completed the follow-up survey. Fifty-one percent (104/205) reported experiencing some difficulty in insertion, although only 46% (130/284) had seen an instructional demonstration. Approximately half (105/204) of women rated the sensation and comfort of the female condom as the same or better than the male condom, and 66% (137/204) reported that it provided the same or better lubrication. Approximately half of women said they would consider using the female condom again for STI prevention (51% (133/260)) or contraception (40% (103/260)), or would recommend to others (43% (112/260)).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Findings highlight the need for increased health promotion and education regarding use of the female condom. To increase access it will be important to address method cost and availability in Australia. Future research should explore other perspectives of this method, including among the LGBTIQ+ community.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246664
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah E Fenwick
Jessica R Botfield
Prudence Kidman
Kevin McGeechan
Deborah Bateson
spellingShingle Sarah E Fenwick
Jessica R Botfield
Prudence Kidman
Kevin McGeechan
Deborah Bateson
Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sarah E Fenwick
Jessica R Botfield
Prudence Kidman
Kevin McGeechan
Deborah Bateson
author_sort Sarah E Fenwick
title Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
title_short Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
title_full Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
title_fullStr Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
title_full_unstemmed Views and experiences of the female condom in Australia: An exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
title_sort views and experiences of the female condom in australia: an exploratory cross-sectional survey of cisgender women.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>The female condom is the only female-initiated form of protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmissible infections (STIs). However, use of this method in Australia is low. To better understand women's views and experiences of the female condom, we conducted an interventional cross-sectional study.<h4>Methods</h4>Cisgender women ≥16 years, heterosexually active and living in New South Wales were recruited through social media advertisements and email invitations to clients of a family planning service. Eligible participants were provided with three female condoms and invited to complete a follow-up survey. Survey responses for women who attempted to use at least one female condom were summarised using counts and proportions.<h4>Results</h4>We recruited 556 women; few (30/556) had used the female condom before the study. There were 284 women who used, or attempted to use, a female condom during the study and completed the follow-up survey. Fifty-one percent (104/205) reported experiencing some difficulty in insertion, although only 46% (130/284) had seen an instructional demonstration. Approximately half (105/204) of women rated the sensation and comfort of the female condom as the same or better than the male condom, and 66% (137/204) reported that it provided the same or better lubrication. Approximately half of women said they would consider using the female condom again for STI prevention (51% (133/260)) or contraception (40% (103/260)), or would recommend to others (43% (112/260)).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Findings highlight the need for increased health promotion and education regarding use of the female condom. To increase access it will be important to address method cost and availability in Australia. Future research should explore other perspectives of this method, including among the LGBTIQ+ community.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246664
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahefenwick viewsandexperiencesofthefemalecondominaustraliaanexploratorycrosssectionalsurveyofcisgenderwomen
AT jessicarbotfield viewsandexperiencesofthefemalecondominaustraliaanexploratorycrosssectionalsurveyofcisgenderwomen
AT prudencekidman viewsandexperiencesofthefemalecondominaustraliaanexploratorycrosssectionalsurveyofcisgenderwomen
AT kevinmcgeechan viewsandexperiencesofthefemalecondominaustraliaanexploratorycrosssectionalsurveyofcisgenderwomen
AT deborahbateson viewsandexperiencesofthefemalecondominaustraliaanexploratorycrosssectionalsurveyofcisgenderwomen
_version_ 1721209103953428480