Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Qualitative study consisting of separa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoogerbrugge Peter M, van Dulmen Sandra, Otten Roel, Zwaanswijk Marieke, Tates Kiek, Kamps Willem A, Bensing Jozien M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/9/15
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8–17), 11 parents, and 18 survivors of childhood cancer (aged 8–17 at diagnosis).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All three participant groups could be actively engaged over a one-week period. Respondents highly valued the flexibility and convenience of logging in at their own time and place to join the discussion. Adolescent patients and survivors emphasized that the anonymity experienced made them feel comfortable to express their views in detail. The findings indicate a strong preference for online group discussions across all participant groups.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The findings show that online focus group methodology is a feasible tool for collecting qualitative data within the setting of paediatric oncology, and may offer new opportunities to collect data in other hard-to-include populations. The evaluations seem to indicate that the online group discussions have given participants an opportunity to articulate their experiences and views in a way they might not have done in a traditional group discussion.</p>
ISSN:1471-2288