A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses

Proper pain therapy requires adequate pain assessment. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Unesp-Botucatu horse acute pain scale (UHAPS), the Orthopedic Composite Pain Scale (CPS) and unidimensional scales in horses admitted for orthopedic and soft tissue surgery. Forty-two hors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Barreto da Rocha, Bernd Driessen, Sue M. McDonnell, Klaus Hopster, Laura Zarucco, Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla, Charlotte Hopster-Iversen, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade, Thamiris Kristine Gonzaga da Rocha, Marilda Onghero Taffarel, Bruna Bodini Alonso, Stijn Schauvliege, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341545/?tool=EBI
id doaj-a1c94b8025d64095a00084ff10a72a38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1c94b8025d64095a00084ff10a72a382021-08-08T04:31:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01168A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horsesPaula Barreto da RochaBernd DriessenSue M. McDonnellKlaus HopsterLaura ZaruccoMiguel Gozalo-MarcillaCharlotte Hopster-IversenPedro Henrique Esteves TrindadeThamiris Kristine Gonzaga da RochaMarilda Onghero TaffarelBruna Bodini AlonsoStijn SchauvliegeStelio Pacca Loureiro LunaProper pain therapy requires adequate pain assessment. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Unesp-Botucatu horse acute pain scale (UHAPS), the Orthopedic Composite Pain Scale (CPS) and unidimensional scales in horses admitted for orthopedic and soft tissue surgery. Forty-two horses were assessed and videotaped before surgery, up to 4 hours postoperatively, up to 3 hours after analgesic treatment, and 24 hours postoperatively (168 video clips). After six evaluators viewing each edited video clip twice in random order at a 20-day interval, they chose whether analgesia would be indicated and applied the Simple Descriptive, Numeric and Visual Analog scales, CPS, and UHAPS. For all evaluators, intra-observer reliability of UHAPS and CPS ranged from 0.70 to 0.97. Reproducibility was variable among the evaluators and ranged from poor to very good for all scales. Principal component analysis showed a weak association among 50% and 62% of the UHAPS and CPS items, respectively. Criterion validity based on Spearman correlation among all scales was above 0.67. Internal consistency was minimally acceptable (0.51–0.64). Item-total correlation was acceptable (0.3–0.7) for 50% and 38% of UHAPS and CPS items, respectively. UHAPS and CPS were specific (90% and 79% respectively), but both were not sensitive (43 and 38%, respectively). Construct validity (responsiveness) was confirmed for all scales because pain scores increased after surgery. The cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 5 and ≥ 7 for the UHAPS and CPS, respectively. All scales presented adequate repeatability, criterion validity, and partial responsiveness. Both composite scales showed poor association among items, minimally acceptable internal consistency, and weak sensitivity, indicating that they are suboptimal instruments for assessing postoperative pain. Both composite scales require further refinement with the exclusion of redundant or needless items and reduction of their maximum score applied to each item or should be replaced by other tools.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341545/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paula Barreto da Rocha
Bernd Driessen
Sue M. McDonnell
Klaus Hopster
Laura Zarucco
Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla
Charlotte Hopster-Iversen
Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Thamiris Kristine Gonzaga da Rocha
Marilda Onghero Taffarel
Bruna Bodini Alonso
Stijn Schauvliege
Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
spellingShingle Paula Barreto da Rocha
Bernd Driessen
Sue M. McDonnell
Klaus Hopster
Laura Zarucco
Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla
Charlotte Hopster-Iversen
Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Thamiris Kristine Gonzaga da Rocha
Marilda Onghero Taffarel
Bruna Bodini Alonso
Stijn Schauvliege
Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
PLoS ONE
author_facet Paula Barreto da Rocha
Bernd Driessen
Sue M. McDonnell
Klaus Hopster
Laura Zarucco
Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla
Charlotte Hopster-Iversen
Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Thamiris Kristine Gonzaga da Rocha
Marilda Onghero Taffarel
Bruna Bodini Alonso
Stijn Schauvliege
Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
author_sort Paula Barreto da Rocha
title A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
title_short A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
title_full A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
title_fullStr A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
title_full_unstemmed A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
title_sort critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Proper pain therapy requires adequate pain assessment. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Unesp-Botucatu horse acute pain scale (UHAPS), the Orthopedic Composite Pain Scale (CPS) and unidimensional scales in horses admitted for orthopedic and soft tissue surgery. Forty-two horses were assessed and videotaped before surgery, up to 4 hours postoperatively, up to 3 hours after analgesic treatment, and 24 hours postoperatively (168 video clips). After six evaluators viewing each edited video clip twice in random order at a 20-day interval, they chose whether analgesia would be indicated and applied the Simple Descriptive, Numeric and Visual Analog scales, CPS, and UHAPS. For all evaluators, intra-observer reliability of UHAPS and CPS ranged from 0.70 to 0.97. Reproducibility was variable among the evaluators and ranged from poor to very good for all scales. Principal component analysis showed a weak association among 50% and 62% of the UHAPS and CPS items, respectively. Criterion validity based on Spearman correlation among all scales was above 0.67. Internal consistency was minimally acceptable (0.51–0.64). Item-total correlation was acceptable (0.3–0.7) for 50% and 38% of UHAPS and CPS items, respectively. UHAPS and CPS were specific (90% and 79% respectively), but both were not sensitive (43 and 38%, respectively). Construct validity (responsiveness) was confirmed for all scales because pain scores increased after surgery. The cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 5 and ≥ 7 for the UHAPS and CPS, respectively. All scales presented adequate repeatability, criterion validity, and partial responsiveness. Both composite scales showed poor association among items, minimally acceptable internal consistency, and weak sensitivity, indicating that they are suboptimal instruments for assessing postoperative pain. Both composite scales require further refinement with the exclusion of redundant or needless items and reduction of their maximum score applied to each item or should be replaced by other tools.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341545/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT paulabarretodarocha acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT bernddriessen acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT suemmcdonnell acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT klaushopster acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT laurazarucco acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT miguelgozalomarcilla acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT charlottehopsteriversen acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT pedrohenriqueestevestrindade acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT thamiriskristinegonzagadarocha acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT marildaongherotaffarel acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT brunabodinialonso acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT stijnschauvliege acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT steliopaccaloureiroluna acriticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT paulabarretodarocha criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT bernddriessen criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT suemmcdonnell criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT klaushopster criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT laurazarucco criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT miguelgozalomarcilla criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT charlottehopsteriversen criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT pedrohenriqueestevestrindade criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT thamiriskristinegonzagadarocha criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT marildaongherotaffarel criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT brunabodinialonso criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT stijnschauvliege criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
AT steliopaccaloureiroluna criticalevaluationforvalidationofcompositeandunidimensionalpostoperativepainscalesinhorses
_version_ 1721216614405242880