An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu, Vaiyapuri Ravi, Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar, Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar, Anjaneya Shiva Prasad, Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=Palanivelu
id doaj-a1bcfefc275144df8c106d8ca977ac00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1bcfefc275144df8c106d8ca977ac002020-11-25T00:23:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062019-01-0111643844110.4103/JPBS.JPBS_64_19An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation techniqueChandrika Ramanathan PalaniveluVaiyapuri RaviArthanarieswaran Andamuthu SivakumarJambai Sampathkumar SivakumarAnjaneya Shiva PrasadKaneesh Karthik ArthanariAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. Results: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. Conclusion: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=PalaniveluAH plusNanosealsealersingle-cone obturationstereo-operating microscope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu
Vaiyapuri Ravi
Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar
Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar
Anjaneya Shiva Prasad
Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari
spellingShingle Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu
Vaiyapuri Ravi
Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar
Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar
Anjaneya Shiva Prasad
Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
AH plus
Nanoseal
sealer
single-cone obturation
stereo-operating microscope
author_facet Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu
Vaiyapuri Ravi
Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar
Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar
Anjaneya Shiva Prasad
Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari
author_sort Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu
title An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
title_short An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
title_full An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
title_fullStr An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
title_sort in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
issn 0975-7406
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. Results: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. Conclusion: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol.
topic AH plus
Nanoseal
sealer
single-cone obturation
stereo-operating microscope
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=Palanivelu
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrikaramanathanpalanivelu aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT vaiyapuriravi aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT arthanarieswaranandamuthusivakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT jambaisampathkumarsivakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT anjaneyashivaprasad aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT kaneeshkarthikarthanari aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT chandrikaramanathanpalanivelu invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT vaiyapuriravi invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT arthanarieswaranandamuthusivakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT jambaisampathkumarsivakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT anjaneyashivaprasad invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
AT kaneeshkarthikarthanari invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique
_version_ 1725356445268967424