An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. W...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=Palanivelu |
id |
doaj-a1bcfefc275144df8c106d8ca977ac00 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a1bcfefc275144df8c106d8ca977ac002020-11-25T00:23:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062019-01-0111643844110.4103/JPBS.JPBS_64_19An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation techniqueChandrika Ramanathan PalaniveluVaiyapuri RaviArthanarieswaran Andamuthu SivakumarJambai Sampathkumar SivakumarAnjaneya Shiva PrasadKaneesh Karthik ArthanariAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. Results: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. Conclusion: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=PalaniveluAH plusNanosealsealersingle-cone obturationstereo-operating microscope |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu Vaiyapuri Ravi Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar Anjaneya Shiva Prasad Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari |
spellingShingle |
Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu Vaiyapuri Ravi Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar Anjaneya Shiva Prasad Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences AH plus Nanoseal sealer single-cone obturation stereo-operating microscope |
author_facet |
Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu Vaiyapuri Ravi Arthanarieswaran Andamuthu Sivakumar Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar Anjaneya Shiva Prasad Kaneesh Karthik Arthanari |
author_sort |
Chandrika Ramanathan Palanivelu |
title |
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
title_short |
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
title_full |
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
title_fullStr |
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
title_full_unstemmed |
An in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
title_sort |
in vitro comparative evaluation of distribution of three different sealers by single-cone obturation technique |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
issn |
0975-7406 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of sealer at different levels of the root canal using three different sealers in a single-cone obturation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and access opening was performed. Working length was determined. Cleaning and shaping were done till 25 size K file followed by ProTaper till F2 size. Teeth were then obturated with matching gutta-percha points with the following sealers: Group I, 10 teeth with zinc oxide eugenol sealer; Group II, 10 teeth with AH plus sealer; and Group III, 10 teeth with NanoSeal-S sealer. Teeth were cross sectioned at 3 and 6mm from the apex. Color photographs of sections were taken at a magnification of ×40 using a camera connected to a stereo-operating microscope and the images were transferred to a computer. Sealer distribution was observed and the canal perimeters coated or uncoated with the sealer can be calculated using a computer digital imaging system. Results: Of the three groups, zinc oxide eugenol showed least sealer distribution. AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed no significant difference between the distribution at the 3- and 6-mm levels. Conclusion: Both AH Plus and Nanoseal-S showed excellent sealer distribution when compared to zinc oxide eugenol. |
topic |
AH plus Nanoseal sealer single-cone obturation stereo-operating microscope |
url |
http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2019;volume=11;issue=6;spage=438;epage=441;aulast=Palanivelu |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chandrikaramanathanpalanivelu aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT vaiyapuriravi aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT arthanarieswaranandamuthusivakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT jambaisampathkumarsivakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT anjaneyashivaprasad aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT kaneeshkarthikarthanari aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT chandrikaramanathanpalanivelu invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT vaiyapuriravi invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT arthanarieswaranandamuthusivakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT jambaisampathkumarsivakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT anjaneyashivaprasad invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique AT kaneeshkarthikarthanari invitrocomparativeevaluationofdistributionofthreedifferentsealersbysingleconeobturationtechnique |
_version_ |
1725356445268967424 |