A randomised, open-label study of umeclidinium versus glycopyrronium in patients with COPD
This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily umeclidinium 62.5 µg with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 µg in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This was a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0223661...
Main Authors: | Tara Rheault, Sanjeev Khindri, Mitra Vahdati-Bolouri, Alison Church, William A. Fahy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
European Respiratory Society
2016-04-01
|
Series: | ERJ Open Research |
Online Access: | http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/2/2/00101-2015.full |
Similar Items
-
A randomized, blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium 62.5 µg compared with tiotropium 18 µg in patients with COPD
by: Feldman G, et al.
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial
by: François Maltais, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Efficacy and safety of direct switch to indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with moderate COPD: the CRYSTAL open-label randomised trial
by: Claus F. Vogelmeier, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Effects of umeclidinium/vilanterol on exercise endurance in COPD: a randomised study
by: John H. Riley, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol
by: Singh D, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)