Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

Objective To investigate the influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Methods A total of 158 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who underwent TIPS in The G...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ZHOU Hao
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2019-10-01
Series:Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
Online Access:http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10243
id doaj-a1a0d8ec123745d6a47d80ea7e70d8f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1a0d8ec123745d6a47d80ea7e70d8f02020-11-24T21:24:07ZzhoEditorial Department of Journal of Clinical HepatologyLinchuang Gandanbing Zazhi1001-52561001-52562019-10-01351022052209Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertensionZHOU Hao0Department of Gastroenterology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of the Chinese PLA, Chengdu 610083, China Objective To investigate the influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Methods A total of 158 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who underwent TIPS in The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of the Chinese PLA from January 2015 to December 2018 were enrolled. Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP), free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP), and portal venous pressure (PVP) were measured during TIPS, and HVPG and portal venous pressure gradient (PVPG) were calculated. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups; a one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison between multiple groups, and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between HVPG and PVPG, and a multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis was used to investigate the independent risk factors for HVPG. Results HVPG was positively correlated with PVPG (r=0.796, P<0.001). The one-way analysis of variance showed that age and etiology were influencing factors for HVPG (F=19.900 and 10.287, both P<0.001). The multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis showed that age and etiology were independent influencing factors for HVPG (t=7.870 and -2.178, both P<0.001). Conclusion Age and etiology are independent influencing factors for HVPG in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, and the patients aged ≥60 years or the patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis tend to have higher HVPG. http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10243
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author ZHOU Hao
spellingShingle ZHOU Hao
Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
author_facet ZHOU Hao
author_sort ZHOU Hao
title Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
title_short Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
title_full Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
title_fullStr Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
title_sort influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Hepatology
series Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi
issn 1001-5256
1001-5256
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Objective To investigate the influencing factors for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Methods A total of 158 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension who underwent TIPS in The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of the Chinese PLA from January 2015 to December 2018 were enrolled. Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP), free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP), and portal venous pressure (PVP) were measured during TIPS, and HVPG and portal venous pressure gradient (PVPG) were calculated. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups; a one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison between multiple groups, and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between HVPG and PVPG, and a multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis was used to investigate the independent risk factors for HVPG. Results HVPG was positively correlated with PVPG (r=0.796, P<0.001). The one-way analysis of variance showed that age and etiology were influencing factors for HVPG (F=19.900 and 10.287, both P<0.001). The multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis showed that age and etiology were independent influencing factors for HVPG (t=7.870 and -2.178, both P<0.001). Conclusion Age and etiology are independent influencing factors for HVPG in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension, and the patients aged ≥60 years or the patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis tend to have higher HVPG.
url http://www.lcgdbzz.org/qk_content.asp?id=10243
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhao influencingfactorsforhepaticvenouspressuregradientinpatientswithcirrhoticportalhypertension
_version_ 1725989567994003456