Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
Mapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultur...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-a190fe292aa0478887f54475d0904698 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a190fe292aa0478887f54475d09046982020-11-25T01:32:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6843710.1371/journal.pone.0068437Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.Stefano CasalegnoRichard IngerCaitlin DesilveyKevin J GastonMapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultural services (the non-material benefits people gain from nature). This is largely because of challenges associated with the spatially specific quantification of cultural ecosystem services. We propose an innovative approach for evaluating a cultural service, the perceived aesthetic value of ecosystems, by quantifying geo-tagged digital photographs uploaded to social media resources. Our analysis proceeds from the premise that images will be captured by greater numbers of people in areas that are more highly valued for their aesthetic attributes. This approach was applied in Cornwall, UK, to carry out a spatial analysis of the covariation between ecosystem services: soil carbon stocks, agricultural production, and aesthetic value. Our findings suggest that online geo-tagged images provide an effective metric for mapping a key component of cultural ecosystem services. They also highlight the non-stationarity in the spatial relationships between patterns of ecosystem services.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stefano Casalegno Richard Inger Caitlin Desilvey Kevin J Gaston |
spellingShingle |
Stefano Casalegno Richard Inger Caitlin Desilvey Kevin J Gaston Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Stefano Casalegno Richard Inger Caitlin Desilvey Kevin J Gaston |
author_sort |
Stefano Casalegno |
title |
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
title_short |
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
title_full |
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
title_fullStr |
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
title_sort |
spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Mapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultural services (the non-material benefits people gain from nature). This is largely because of challenges associated with the spatially specific quantification of cultural ecosystem services. We propose an innovative approach for evaluating a cultural service, the perceived aesthetic value of ecosystems, by quantifying geo-tagged digital photographs uploaded to social media resources. Our analysis proceeds from the premise that images will be captured by greater numbers of people in areas that are more highly valued for their aesthetic attributes. This approach was applied in Cornwall, UK, to carry out a spatial analysis of the covariation between ecosystem services: soil carbon stocks, agricultural production, and aesthetic value. Our findings suggest that online geo-tagged images provide an effective metric for mapping a key component of cultural ecosystem services. They also highlight the non-stationarity in the spatial relationships between patterns of ecosystem services. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanocasalegno spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices AT richardinger spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices AT caitlindesilvey spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices AT kevinjgaston spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices |
_version_ |
1725083124807761920 |