Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.

Mapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefano Casalegno, Richard Inger, Caitlin Desilvey, Kevin J Gaston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render
id doaj-a190fe292aa0478887f54475d0904698
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a190fe292aa0478887f54475d09046982020-11-25T01:32:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6843710.1371/journal.pone.0068437Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.Stefano CasalegnoRichard IngerCaitlin DesilveyKevin J GastonMapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultural services (the non-material benefits people gain from nature). This is largely because of challenges associated with the spatially specific quantification of cultural ecosystem services. We propose an innovative approach for evaluating a cultural service, the perceived aesthetic value of ecosystems, by quantifying geo-tagged digital photographs uploaded to social media resources. Our analysis proceeds from the premise that images will be captured by greater numbers of people in areas that are more highly valued for their aesthetic attributes. This approach was applied in Cornwall, UK, to carry out a spatial analysis of the covariation between ecosystem services: soil carbon stocks, agricultural production, and aesthetic value. Our findings suggest that online geo-tagged images provide an effective metric for mapping a key component of cultural ecosystem services. They also highlight the non-stationarity in the spatial relationships between patterns of ecosystem services.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefano Casalegno
Richard Inger
Caitlin Desilvey
Kevin J Gaston
spellingShingle Stefano Casalegno
Richard Inger
Caitlin Desilvey
Kevin J Gaston
Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stefano Casalegno
Richard Inger
Caitlin Desilvey
Kevin J Gaston
author_sort Stefano Casalegno
title Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
title_short Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
title_full Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
title_fullStr Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
title_full_unstemmed Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
title_sort spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Mapping the spatial distribution of ecosystem goods and services represents a burgeoning field of research, although how different services covary with one another remains poorly understood. This is particularly true for the covariation of supporting, provisioning and regulating services with cultural services (the non-material benefits people gain from nature). This is largely because of challenges associated with the spatially specific quantification of cultural ecosystem services. We propose an innovative approach for evaluating a cultural service, the perceived aesthetic value of ecosystems, by quantifying geo-tagged digital photographs uploaded to social media resources. Our analysis proceeds from the premise that images will be captured by greater numbers of people in areas that are more highly valued for their aesthetic attributes. This approach was applied in Cornwall, UK, to carry out a spatial analysis of the covariation between ecosystem services: soil carbon stocks, agricultural production, and aesthetic value. Our findings suggest that online geo-tagged images provide an effective metric for mapping a key component of cultural ecosystem services. They also highlight the non-stationarity in the spatial relationships between patterns of ecosystem services.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3695933?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanocasalegno spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices
AT richardinger spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices
AT caitlindesilvey spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices
AT kevinjgaston spatialcovariancebetweenaestheticvalueotherecosystemservices
_version_ 1725083124807761920