Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden

The article considers current policy trends and academic controversies related to qualitative data preservation and re-use. In the first part of the article, the epistemological/methodological, ethical/legal, ideological/political, and practical/technical aspects of the ongoing British debate about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zoran Slavnic
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2013-03-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1872
id doaj-a19087122a8e4bdc9aaa3b62cfa413cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a19087122a8e4bdc9aaa3b62cfa413cb2020-11-25T00:45:17ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272013-03-011421566Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and SwedenZoran Slavnic0Linköping UniversityThe article considers current policy trends and academic controversies related to qualitative data preservation and re-use. In the first part of the article, the epistemological/methodological, ethical/legal, ideological/political, and practical/technical aspects of the ongoing British debate about data archiving and re-use are presented and commented. In the second part, the Swedish case is briefly described and considered in light of the academic concerns that have been raised by the British debate. The situation in Sweden may be summarized in three points: First, there are many signs that the infrastructure for qualitative data archiving and re-use is being developed without the active participation of sufficient representatives of the qualitative research community; second, there are many signs that developing the infrastructure takes as a point of departure neo-positivistic or foundational epistemology, treating qualitative data in the same way as quantitative data, with all the methodological problems resulting from this; and third there are very few, if any, signs that serious academic debate has started in relation to all the issues that have been raised by the corresponding debate in Britain. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1302108http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1872qualitative data preservationqualitative data re-usequalitative data archivingqualitative databases in Sweden
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zoran Slavnic
spellingShingle Zoran Slavnic
Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
qualitative data preservation
qualitative data re-use
qualitative data archiving
qualitative databases in Sweden
author_facet Zoran Slavnic
author_sort Zoran Slavnic
title Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
title_short Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
title_full Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
title_fullStr Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden
title_sort towards qualitative data preservation and re-use—policy trends and academic controversies in uk and sweden
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2013-03-01
description The article considers current policy trends and academic controversies related to qualitative data preservation and re-use. In the first part of the article, the epistemological/methodological, ethical/legal, ideological/political, and practical/technical aspects of the ongoing British debate about data archiving and re-use are presented and commented. In the second part, the Swedish case is briefly described and considered in light of the academic concerns that have been raised by the British debate. The situation in Sweden may be summarized in three points: First, there are many signs that the infrastructure for qualitative data archiving and re-use is being developed without the active participation of sufficient representatives of the qualitative research community; second, there are many signs that developing the infrastructure takes as a point of departure neo-positivistic or foundational epistemology, treating qualitative data in the same way as quantitative data, with all the methodological problems resulting from this; and third there are very few, if any, signs that serious academic debate has started in relation to all the issues that have been raised by the corresponding debate in Britain. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1302108
topic qualitative data preservation
qualitative data re-use
qualitative data archiving
qualitative databases in Sweden
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1872
work_keys_str_mv AT zoranslavnic towardsqualitativedatapreservationandreusepolicytrendsandacademiccontroversiesinukandsweden
_version_ 1725271006408343552