Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larg...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Brain Stimulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037 |
id |
doaj-a17d67f247d9419eb4e2dc50137f7327 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a17d67f247d9419eb4e2dc50137f73272021-03-19T07:06:12ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-03-01102298304Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adultsGeorge M. Opie0Eleni Vosnakis1Michael C. Ridding2Ulf Ziemann3John G. Semmler4Discipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaDiscipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaRobinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaDepartment of Neurology & Stroke, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyDiscipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Corresponding author. School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larger plastic response observed following priming with both long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)-like protocols. However, it is not known if priming stimulation can also modulate plasticity in older adults. Objective: To investigate if priming NIBS can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity in old subjects. Methods: In 16 young (22.3 ± 1.0 years) and 16 old (70.2 ± 1.7 years) subjects, we investigated the response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; LTP-like) when applied 10 min after sham stimulation, continuous TBS (cTBS; LTD-like) or an identical block of iTBS. Corticospinal plasticity was assessed by recording changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Results: In young subjects, priming with cTBS (cTBS + iTBS) resulted in larger MEPs than priming with either iTBS (iTBS + iTBS; P = 0.001) or sham (sham + iTBS; P < 0.0001), while larger MEPs were seen following iTBS + iTBS than sham + iTBS (P < 0.0001). In old subjects, the response to iTBS + iTBS was not different to sham + iTBS (P > 0.9), whereas the response to cTBS + iTBS was reduced relative to iTBS + iTBS (P = 0.02) and sham + iTBS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Priming TBS is ineffective for modifying M1 plasticity in older adults, which may limit the therapeutic use of priming stimulation in neurological conditions common in the elderly.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037AgeingTranscranial magnetic stimulationTheta burst stimulationMetaplasticityPriming |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
George M. Opie Eleni Vosnakis Michael C. Ridding Ulf Ziemann John G. Semmler |
spellingShingle |
George M. Opie Eleni Vosnakis Michael C. Ridding Ulf Ziemann John G. Semmler Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults Brain Stimulation Ageing Transcranial magnetic stimulation Theta burst stimulation Metaplasticity Priming |
author_facet |
George M. Opie Eleni Vosnakis Michael C. Ridding Ulf Ziemann John G. Semmler |
author_sort |
George M. Opie |
title |
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
title_short |
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
title_full |
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
title_fullStr |
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
title_sort |
priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brain Stimulation |
issn |
1935-861X |
publishDate |
2017-03-01 |
description |
Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larger plastic response observed following priming with both long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)-like protocols. However, it is not known if priming stimulation can also modulate plasticity in older adults. Objective: To investigate if priming NIBS can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity in old subjects. Methods: In 16 young (22.3 ± 1.0 years) and 16 old (70.2 ± 1.7 years) subjects, we investigated the response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; LTP-like) when applied 10 min after sham stimulation, continuous TBS (cTBS; LTD-like) or an identical block of iTBS. Corticospinal plasticity was assessed by recording changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Results: In young subjects, priming with cTBS (cTBS + iTBS) resulted in larger MEPs than priming with either iTBS (iTBS + iTBS; P = 0.001) or sham (sham + iTBS; P < 0.0001), while larger MEPs were seen following iTBS + iTBS than sham + iTBS (P < 0.0001). In old subjects, the response to iTBS + iTBS was not different to sham + iTBS (P > 0.9), whereas the response to cTBS + iTBS was reduced relative to iTBS + iTBS (P = 0.02) and sham + iTBS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Priming TBS is ineffective for modifying M1 plasticity in older adults, which may limit the therapeutic use of priming stimulation in neurological conditions common in the elderly. |
topic |
Ageing Transcranial magnetic stimulation Theta burst stimulation Metaplasticity Priming |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT georgemopie primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults AT elenivosnakis primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults AT michaelcridding primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults AT ulfziemann primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults AT johngsemmler primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults |
_version_ |
1724214529961754624 |