Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults

Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George M. Opie, Eleni Vosnakis, Michael C. Ridding, Ulf Ziemann, John G. Semmler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-03-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037
id doaj-a17d67f247d9419eb4e2dc50137f7327
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a17d67f247d9419eb4e2dc50137f73272021-03-19T07:06:12ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-03-01102298304Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adultsGeorge M. Opie0Eleni Vosnakis1Michael C. Ridding2Ulf Ziemann3John G. Semmler4Discipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaDiscipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaRobinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, AustraliaDepartment of Neurology &amp; Stroke, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyDiscipline of Physiology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Corresponding author. School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larger plastic response observed following priming with both long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)-like protocols. However, it is not known if priming stimulation can also modulate plasticity in older adults. Objective: To investigate if priming NIBS can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity in old subjects. Methods: In 16 young (22.3 ± 1.0 years) and 16 old (70.2 ± 1.7 years) subjects, we investigated the response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; LTP-like) when applied 10 min after sham stimulation, continuous TBS (cTBS; LTD-like) or an identical block of iTBS. Corticospinal plasticity was assessed by recording changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Results: In young subjects, priming with cTBS (cTBS + iTBS) resulted in larger MEPs than priming with either iTBS (iTBS + iTBS; P = 0.001) or sham (sham + iTBS; P < 0.0001), while larger MEPs were seen following iTBS + iTBS than sham + iTBS (P < 0.0001). In old subjects, the response to iTBS + iTBS was not different to sham + iTBS (P > 0.9), whereas the response to cTBS + iTBS was reduced relative to iTBS + iTBS (P = 0.02) and sham + iTBS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Priming TBS is ineffective for modifying M1 plasticity in older adults, which may limit the therapeutic use of priming stimulation in neurological conditions common in the elderly.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037AgeingTranscranial magnetic stimulationTheta burst stimulationMetaplasticityPriming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author George M. Opie
Eleni Vosnakis
Michael C. Ridding
Ulf Ziemann
John G. Semmler
spellingShingle George M. Opie
Eleni Vosnakis
Michael C. Ridding
Ulf Ziemann
John G. Semmler
Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
Brain Stimulation
Ageing
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Theta burst stimulation
Metaplasticity
Priming
author_facet George M. Opie
Eleni Vosnakis
Michael C. Ridding
Ulf Ziemann
John G. Semmler
author_sort George M. Opie
title Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
title_short Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
title_full Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
title_fullStr Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
title_full_unstemmed Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
title_sort priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Background: Primary motor cortex neuroplasticity is reduced in old adults, which may contribute to the motor deficits commonly observed in the elderly. Previous research in young subjects suggests that the neuroplastic response can be enhanced using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), with a larger plastic response observed following priming with both long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD)-like protocols. However, it is not known if priming stimulation can also modulate plasticity in older adults. Objective: To investigate if priming NIBS can be used to modulate motor cortical plasticity in old subjects. Methods: In 16 young (22.3 ± 1.0 years) and 16 old (70.2 ± 1.7 years) subjects, we investigated the response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; LTP-like) when applied 10 min after sham stimulation, continuous TBS (cTBS; LTD-like) or an identical block of iTBS. Corticospinal plasticity was assessed by recording changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. Results: In young subjects, priming with cTBS (cTBS + iTBS) resulted in larger MEPs than priming with either iTBS (iTBS + iTBS; P = 0.001) or sham (sham + iTBS; P < 0.0001), while larger MEPs were seen following iTBS + iTBS than sham + iTBS (P < 0.0001). In old subjects, the response to iTBS + iTBS was not different to sham + iTBS (P > 0.9), whereas the response to cTBS + iTBS was reduced relative to iTBS + iTBS (P = 0.02) and sham + iTBS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Priming TBS is ineffective for modifying M1 plasticity in older adults, which may limit the therapeutic use of priming stimulation in neurological conditions common in the elderly.
topic Ageing
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Theta burst stimulation
Metaplasticity
Priming
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17300037
work_keys_str_mv AT georgemopie primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults
AT elenivosnakis primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults
AT michaelcridding primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults
AT ulfziemann primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults
AT johngsemmler primingthetaburststimulationenhancesmotorcortexplasticityinyoungbutnotoldadults
_version_ 1724214529961754624