Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
Background In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning C...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open Quality |
Online Access: | https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full |
id |
doaj-a17149c678dc42e18a667db428f347dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a17149c678dc42e18a667db428f347dd2021-04-22T10:01:04ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412021-03-0110110.1136/bmjoq-2020-001261Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnographyKarin Olson0Sunita Vohra1Kiran Pohar Manhas2Katie Churchill3Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaPediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaNeurosciences, Rehabilitation & Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaHealth Professions, Strategy and Practice, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning Collaborative (in-person learning sessions; balanced scorecards). More research is required on developing, implementing and evaluating models of care. We aimed to explore experiences of early-adopter providers and provincial consultants involved in the community-rehabilitation RMoC implementation in Alberta, Canada.Methods Using focused ethnography, we used focus groups (or interviews for feasibility/confidentiality) and aggregate, site-level data analysis of RMoC standardised metrics. Purposive sampling ensured representation across geography, service types and patient populations. Team-specific focus groups were onsite and led by a researcher-moderator and cofacilitator. A semistructured question guide promoted discussions on interesting/challenging occurrences; perceptions of RMoC impact and perceptions of successful implementation. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed alongside field notes. Data collection and analysis were concurrent to saturation. Transcripts coding involves collapsing similar ideas into themes, with intertheme relationships identified. Rigour tactics included negative case analysis, thick description and audit trail.Results We completed 11 focus groups and seven interviews (03/2018 to 01/2019) (n=45). Participants were 89.6% women, mostly Canadian trained and represented diverse rehabilitation professions. The implementation experience involved navigating emotions, operating among dynamics and integrating the RMoC details. Confident, satisfied early-adopter teams demonstrated traits including strong coping strategies; management support and being opportunistic and candid about failure. Teams faced common challenges (eg, emotions of change; delayed data access and lack of efficient, memorable communication across team and site). Implementation success targeted patient, team and system levels.Conclusions We recommend training priorities for future teams including evaluation training for novice teams; timelines for stepwise implementation; on-site, in-person time with a facilitator and full-team present and prolonged facilitated introductions between similar teams for long-term mentorship.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Karin Olson Sunita Vohra Kiran Pohar Manhas Katie Churchill |
spellingShingle |
Karin Olson Sunita Vohra Kiran Pohar Manhas Katie Churchill Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography BMJ Open Quality |
author_facet |
Karin Olson Sunita Vohra Kiran Pohar Manhas Katie Churchill |
author_sort |
Karin Olson |
title |
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography |
title_short |
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography |
title_full |
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography |
title_fullStr |
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography |
title_sort |
implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across alberta, canada: a focused ethnography |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open Quality |
issn |
2399-6641 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Background In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning Collaborative (in-person learning sessions; balanced scorecards). More research is required on developing, implementing and evaluating models of care. We aimed to explore experiences of early-adopter providers and provincial consultants involved in the community-rehabilitation RMoC implementation in Alberta, Canada.Methods Using focused ethnography, we used focus groups (or interviews for feasibility/confidentiality) and aggregate, site-level data analysis of RMoC standardised metrics. Purposive sampling ensured representation across geography, service types and patient populations. Team-specific focus groups were onsite and led by a researcher-moderator and cofacilitator. A semistructured question guide promoted discussions on interesting/challenging occurrences; perceptions of RMoC impact and perceptions of successful implementation. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed alongside field notes. Data collection and analysis were concurrent to saturation. Transcripts coding involves collapsing similar ideas into themes, with intertheme relationships identified. Rigour tactics included negative case analysis, thick description and audit trail.Results We completed 11 focus groups and seven interviews (03/2018 to 01/2019) (n=45). Participants were 89.6% women, mostly Canadian trained and represented diverse rehabilitation professions. The implementation experience involved navigating emotions, operating among dynamics and integrating the RMoC details. Confident, satisfied early-adopter teams demonstrated traits including strong coping strategies; management support and being opportunistic and candid about failure. Teams faced common challenges (eg, emotions of change; delayed data access and lack of efficient, memorable communication across team and site). Implementation success targeted patient, team and system levels.Conclusions We recommend training priorities for future teams including evaluation training for novice teams; timelines for stepwise implementation; on-site, in-person time with a facilitator and full-team present and prolonged facilitated introductions between similar teams for long-term mentorship. |
url |
https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karinolson implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography AT sunitavohra implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography AT kiranpoharmanhas implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography AT katiechurchill implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography |
_version_ |
1721514700073598976 |