Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography

Background In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karin Olson, Sunita Vohra, Kiran Pohar Manhas, Katie Churchill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full
id doaj-a17149c678dc42e18a667db428f347dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a17149c678dc42e18a667db428f347dd2021-04-22T10:01:04ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412021-03-0110110.1136/bmjoq-2020-001261Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnographyKarin Olson0Sunita Vohra1Kiran Pohar Manhas2Katie Churchill3Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaPediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaNeurosciences, Rehabilitation & Vision Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaHealth Professions, Strategy and Practice, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning Collaborative (in-person learning sessions; balanced scorecards). More research is required on developing, implementing and evaluating models of care. We aimed to explore experiences of early-adopter providers and provincial consultants involved in the community-rehabilitation RMoC implementation in Alberta, Canada.Methods Using focused ethnography, we used focus groups (or interviews for feasibility/confidentiality) and aggregate, site-level data analysis of RMoC standardised metrics. Purposive sampling ensured representation across geography, service types and patient populations. Team-specific focus groups were onsite and led by a researcher-moderator and cofacilitator. A semistructured question guide promoted discussions on interesting/challenging occurrences; perceptions of RMoC impact and perceptions of successful implementation. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed alongside field notes. Data collection and analysis were concurrent to saturation. Transcripts coding involves collapsing similar ideas into themes, with intertheme relationships identified. Rigour tactics included negative case analysis, thick description and audit trail.Results We completed 11 focus groups and seven interviews (03/2018 to 01/2019) (n=45). Participants were 89.6% women, mostly Canadian trained and represented diverse rehabilitation professions. The implementation experience involved navigating emotions, operating among dynamics and integrating the RMoC details. Confident, satisfied early-adopter teams demonstrated traits including strong coping strategies; management support and being opportunistic and candid about failure. Teams faced common challenges (eg, emotions of change; delayed data access and lack of efficient, memorable communication across team and site). Implementation success targeted patient, team and system levels.Conclusions We recommend training priorities for future teams including evaluation training for novice teams; timelines for stepwise implementation; on-site, in-person time with a facilitator and full-team present and prolonged facilitated introductions between similar teams for long-term mentorship.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karin Olson
Sunita Vohra
Kiran Pohar Manhas
Katie Churchill
spellingShingle Karin Olson
Sunita Vohra
Kiran Pohar Manhas
Katie Churchill
Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
BMJ Open Quality
author_facet Karin Olson
Sunita Vohra
Kiran Pohar Manhas
Katie Churchill
author_sort Karin Olson
title Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
title_short Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
title_full Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
title_fullStr Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across Alberta, Canada: a focused ethnography
title_sort implementation of a novel rehabilitation model of care across alberta, canada: a focused ethnography
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Quality
issn 2399-6641
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Background In 2017, a provincial health-system released a Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC) to promote patient-centred care, provincial standardisation and data-driven innovation. Eighteen early-adopter community-rehabilitation teams implemented the RMoC using a 1.5-year-long Innovation Learning Collaborative (in-person learning sessions; balanced scorecards). More research is required on developing, implementing and evaluating models of care. We aimed to explore experiences of early-adopter providers and provincial consultants involved in the community-rehabilitation RMoC implementation in Alberta, Canada.Methods Using focused ethnography, we used focus groups (or interviews for feasibility/confidentiality) and aggregate, site-level data analysis of RMoC standardised metrics. Purposive sampling ensured representation across geography, service types and patient populations. Team-specific focus groups were onsite and led by a researcher-moderator and cofacilitator. A semistructured question guide promoted discussions on interesting/challenging occurrences; perceptions of RMoC impact and perceptions of successful implementation. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed alongside field notes. Data collection and analysis were concurrent to saturation. Transcripts coding involves collapsing similar ideas into themes, with intertheme relationships identified. Rigour tactics included negative case analysis, thick description and audit trail.Results We completed 11 focus groups and seven interviews (03/2018 to 01/2019) (n=45). Participants were 89.6% women, mostly Canadian trained and represented diverse rehabilitation professions. The implementation experience involved navigating emotions, operating among dynamics and integrating the RMoC details. Confident, satisfied early-adopter teams demonstrated traits including strong coping strategies; management support and being opportunistic and candid about failure. Teams faced common challenges (eg, emotions of change; delayed data access and lack of efficient, memorable communication across team and site). Implementation success targeted patient, team and system levels.Conclusions We recommend training priorities for future teams including evaluation training for novice teams; timelines for stepwise implementation; on-site, in-person time with a facilitator and full-team present and prolonged facilitated introductions between similar teams for long-term mentorship.
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/10/1/e001261.full
work_keys_str_mv AT karinolson implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography
AT sunitavohra implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography
AT kiranpoharmanhas implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography
AT katiechurchill implementationofanovelrehabilitationmodelofcareacrossalbertacanadaafocusedethnography
_version_ 1721514700073598976