Heuristics for the Undecidable

This is a commentary on Michael Lissack’s two-part article “Understanding is a Design Problem: Cognizing from a Designerly Thinking Perspective.” While fundamentally agreeing with the main thrust of Lissack’s argument, this commentary seeks to amplify attention to the pivotal role played by values i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tom Scholte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-01-01
Series:She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587261930084X
id doaj-a158eb86dbae49d2a787846f2a138b99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a158eb86dbae49d2a787846f2a138b992020-11-25T01:10:19ZengElsevierShe Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation2405-87262019-01-0154379382Heuristics for the UndecidableTom Scholte0Department of Theatre and Film, University of British Columbia, CanadaThis is a commentary on Michael Lissack’s two-part article “Understanding is a Design Problem: Cognizing from a Designerly Thinking Perspective.” While fundamentally agreeing with the main thrust of Lissack’s argument, this commentary seeks to amplify attention to the pivotal role played by values in constraining our cognition. Keywords: Critical Systems Heuristics, boundary judgments, valueshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587261930084X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tom Scholte
spellingShingle Tom Scholte
Heuristics for the Undecidable
She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation
author_facet Tom Scholte
author_sort Tom Scholte
title Heuristics for the Undecidable
title_short Heuristics for the Undecidable
title_full Heuristics for the Undecidable
title_fullStr Heuristics for the Undecidable
title_full_unstemmed Heuristics for the Undecidable
title_sort heuristics for the undecidable
publisher Elsevier
series She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation
issn 2405-8726
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This is a commentary on Michael Lissack’s two-part article “Understanding is a Design Problem: Cognizing from a Designerly Thinking Perspective.” While fundamentally agreeing with the main thrust of Lissack’s argument, this commentary seeks to amplify attention to the pivotal role played by values in constraining our cognition. Keywords: Critical Systems Heuristics, boundary judgments, values
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587261930084X
work_keys_str_mv AT tomscholte heuristicsfortheundecidable
_version_ 1725175552859439104