Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning

This research examines the effect of ubiquitous learning strategies using various self regulated learning on learning activeness and learning achievement of student in higher education. Quasi-experimental pretest-post tests non-equivalent control group design is selected to be the method of this res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I Kadek Suartama, Punaji Setyosari, Sulthoni Sulthoni, Saida Ulfa, Muhammad Yunus, Komang Anik Sugiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kassel University Press 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/14953
id doaj-a147189cc8e24632b7e8d55319422e3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a147189cc8e24632b7e8d55319422e3d2021-04-02T19:07:39ZengKassel University PressInternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)1863-03832021-02-011603365610.3991/ijet.v16i03.149537241Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated LearningI Kadek Suartama0Punaji Setyosari1Sulthoni Sulthoni2Saida Ulfa3Muhammad Yunus4Komang Anik Sugiani5Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Negeri MalangUniversitas Syiah KualaPoliteknik Ganesha GuruThis research examines the effect of ubiquitous learning strategies using various self regulated learning on learning activeness and learning achievement of student in higher education. Quasi-experimental pretest-post tests non-equivalent control group design is selected to be the method of this research. The subjects of this research are 113 students. The instrument used to measure the students’ learning activeness is learning activeness questionnaires developed by researcher with reference to the theory of learning activeness by Sardiman, whereas objective test are to evaluate students’ learning achievement, and online self regulated learning questionnaire (OSLQ) as adapted from Barnard is utilized to measure the self regulated learning of the research subjects. The data is then analyzed through two-way MANOVA technique. The findings of the research conclude that: (1) there are significant differences in learning activeness and learning achievement between groups which learned using ubiquitous learning strategies and electronic learning strategies; (2) there are significant differences in learning activeness and learning achievement between students when integrated with high self regulated learning and low self regulated learning; (3) there is an interaction between ubiquitous learning and electronic learning strategies integrated with self regulated learning on learning activeness and learning achievement of students.https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/14953ubiquitous learningelectronic learningself regulated learninglearning activenesslearning achievement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I Kadek Suartama
Punaji Setyosari
Sulthoni Sulthoni
Saida Ulfa
Muhammad Yunus
Komang Anik Sugiani
spellingShingle I Kadek Suartama
Punaji Setyosari
Sulthoni Sulthoni
Saida Ulfa
Muhammad Yunus
Komang Anik Sugiani
Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
ubiquitous learning
electronic learning
self regulated learning
learning activeness
learning achievement
author_facet I Kadek Suartama
Punaji Setyosari
Sulthoni Sulthoni
Saida Ulfa
Muhammad Yunus
Komang Anik Sugiani
author_sort I Kadek Suartama
title Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
title_short Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
title_full Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
title_fullStr Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
title_full_unstemmed Ubiquitous Learning vs. Electronic Learning: A Comparative Study on Learning Activeness and Learning Achievement of Students with Different Self-Regulated Learning
title_sort ubiquitous learning vs. electronic learning: a comparative study on learning activeness and learning achievement of students with different self-regulated learning
publisher Kassel University Press
series International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
issn 1863-0383
publishDate 2021-02-01
description This research examines the effect of ubiquitous learning strategies using various self regulated learning on learning activeness and learning achievement of student in higher education. Quasi-experimental pretest-post tests non-equivalent control group design is selected to be the method of this research. The subjects of this research are 113 students. The instrument used to measure the students’ learning activeness is learning activeness questionnaires developed by researcher with reference to the theory of learning activeness by Sardiman, whereas objective test are to evaluate students’ learning achievement, and online self regulated learning questionnaire (OSLQ) as adapted from Barnard is utilized to measure the self regulated learning of the research subjects. The data is then analyzed through two-way MANOVA technique. The findings of the research conclude that: (1) there are significant differences in learning activeness and learning achievement between groups which learned using ubiquitous learning strategies and electronic learning strategies; (2) there are significant differences in learning activeness and learning achievement between students when integrated with high self regulated learning and low self regulated learning; (3) there is an interaction between ubiquitous learning and electronic learning strategies integrated with self regulated learning on learning activeness and learning achievement of students.
topic ubiquitous learning
electronic learning
self regulated learning
learning activeness
learning achievement
url https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/14953
work_keys_str_mv AT ikadeksuartama ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
AT punajisetyosari ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
AT sulthonisulthoni ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
AT saidaulfa ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
AT muhammadyunus ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
AT komanganiksugiani ubiquitouslearningvselectroniclearningacomparativestudyonlearningactivenessandlearningachievementofstudentswithdifferentselfregulatedlearning
_version_ 1721549534369153024