Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study

Context: Migraine is common debilitating disorders, affecting 10 to 20% of the world's population. However, proper diagnosis is delayed due to many factors. Aims: To determine various factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine. Settings and Design: Hospital-based cross-sectional stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nirendra Kumar Rai, Ritwa Bitswa, Ruchi Singh, Abhijit P Pakhre, Daya Shankar Parauha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=6;spage=1925;epage=1930;aulast=Rai
id doaj-a143132546ab47fca7dae5e1df4a59a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a143132546ab47fca7dae5e1df4a59a22020-11-25T00:56:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632019-01-01861925193010.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_376_19Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional studyNirendra Kumar RaiRitwa BitswaRuchi SinghAbhijit P PakhreDaya Shankar ParauhaContext: Migraine is common debilitating disorders, affecting 10 to 20% of the world's population. However, proper diagnosis is delayed due to many factors. Aims: To determine various factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine. Settings and Design: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Patients attending Neurology OPD of AIIMS Bhopal and satisfying diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (ICHD-3β) for migraine were selected for study. MIDAS, MINI, and ROME-III were used. First diagnosis was considered as “Appropriate” if patients were previously diagnosed as “migraine” or getting treatment for it; otherwise labeled as “Inappropriate.” Statistical Analysis: Associations were tested by Chi-square, t-test, or Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression analysis was used for identifying independent factors associated with inappropriate diagnosis. Results: Hundred patients (female = 77) of migraine were included. Mean age (SD) was 32.42 (10.74). Diagnosis was “inappropriate” in 65 patients. Number of inappropriate diagnosis/appropriate diagnosis was 10/40 (25%) by neurologists; 35/39 (89.3%) by physicians; 18/18 (100%) by ophthalmologists. Factors associated with “Inappropriate Diagnosis” were “Neurologist vs Other Doctors” {10 (25%) vs 55 (91.7%), P < 0.001}; throbbing vs other types of headache {51 (60.7%) vs 14 (87%), P = 0.047}; and temporal vs other sites {9 (42.9%) vs 56 (70.9%), P = 0.017}. Patients with “Inappropriate Diagnosis” had to expend more money {7000 (4,500; 12,500) vs 4000 (1000, 6000), P < 0.01; median (interquartile range) all in INR}. Other clinical parameters including vertigo, cervical pain, anxiety, depression, and functional gastrointestinal symptoms were not associated with delayed diagnosis. Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is very frequent in migraine, leading to financial burden to patients. Management of common disorders like migraine should be addressed in undergraduate medical teaching curriculum.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=6;spage=1925;epage=1930;aulast=RaiDelayed-diagnosisgastrointestinal symptomsmigrainemiss-diagnosisneuropsychiatric comorbidities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nirendra Kumar Rai
Ritwa Bitswa
Ruchi Singh
Abhijit P Pakhre
Daya Shankar Parauha
spellingShingle Nirendra Kumar Rai
Ritwa Bitswa
Ruchi Singh
Abhijit P Pakhre
Daya Shankar Parauha
Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Delayed-diagnosis
gastrointestinal symptoms
migraine
miss-diagnosis
neuropsychiatric comorbidities
author_facet Nirendra Kumar Rai
Ritwa Bitswa
Ruchi Singh
Abhijit P Pakhre
Daya Shankar Parauha
author_sort Nirendra Kumar Rai
title Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_short Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_full Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
title_sort factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
issn 2249-4863
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Context: Migraine is common debilitating disorders, affecting 10 to 20% of the world's population. However, proper diagnosis is delayed due to many factors. Aims: To determine various factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine. Settings and Design: Hospital-based cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Patients attending Neurology OPD of AIIMS Bhopal and satisfying diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (ICHD-3β) for migraine were selected for study. MIDAS, MINI, and ROME-III were used. First diagnosis was considered as “Appropriate” if patients were previously diagnosed as “migraine” or getting treatment for it; otherwise labeled as “Inappropriate.” Statistical Analysis: Associations were tested by Chi-square, t-test, or Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression analysis was used for identifying independent factors associated with inappropriate diagnosis. Results: Hundred patients (female = 77) of migraine were included. Mean age (SD) was 32.42 (10.74). Diagnosis was “inappropriate” in 65 patients. Number of inappropriate diagnosis/appropriate diagnosis was 10/40 (25%) by neurologists; 35/39 (89.3%) by physicians; 18/18 (100%) by ophthalmologists. Factors associated with “Inappropriate Diagnosis” were “Neurologist vs Other Doctors” {10 (25%) vs 55 (91.7%), P < 0.001}; throbbing vs other types of headache {51 (60.7%) vs 14 (87%), P = 0.047}; and temporal vs other sites {9 (42.9%) vs 56 (70.9%), P = 0.017}. Patients with “Inappropriate Diagnosis” had to expend more money {7000 (4,500; 12,500) vs 4000 (1000, 6000), P < 0.01; median (interquartile range) all in INR}. Other clinical parameters including vertigo, cervical pain, anxiety, depression, and functional gastrointestinal symptoms were not associated with delayed diagnosis. Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is very frequent in migraine, leading to financial burden to patients. Management of common disorders like migraine should be addressed in undergraduate medical teaching curriculum.
topic Delayed-diagnosis
gastrointestinal symptoms
migraine
miss-diagnosis
neuropsychiatric comorbidities
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2019;volume=8;issue=6;spage=1925;epage=1930;aulast=Rai
work_keys_str_mv AT nirendrakumarrai factorsassociatedwithdelayeddiagnosisofmigraineahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT ritwabitswa factorsassociatedwithdelayeddiagnosisofmigraineahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT ruchisingh factorsassociatedwithdelayeddiagnosisofmigraineahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT abhijitppakhre factorsassociatedwithdelayeddiagnosisofmigraineahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT dayashankarparauha factorsassociatedwithdelayeddiagnosisofmigraineahospitalbasedcrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1725227927520411648