Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach

It is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stian Bruaset, Håkon Rygg, Sveinung Sægrov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987
id doaj-a13c43cff1a9428283c90a9304ffc629
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a13c43cff1a9428283c90a9304ffc6292020-11-25T00:26:18ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-06-01106198710.3390/su10061987su10061987Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative ApproachStian Bruaset0Håkon Rygg1Sveinung Sægrov2Department of Water and Environment, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayMulticonsult, 0276 Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Water and Environment, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayIt is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water infrastructure rehabilitation strategies, a life cycle approach for survival functions is suggested. A life cycle factor based on survival functions is introduced, which is a measuring value of the total expected service life of all pipes within a group of pipes. Another factor, termed the sustainability factor, is based on the relationship between the life cycle factor and a rehabilitation reference method, which makes it possible to correct the long-term performance of rehabilitation methods based on their expected service life provision. A case study presents the implications for investments in infrastructure rehabilitation when applying the sustainability factor in long-term planning, and shows the importance of considering the service life of rehabilitation methods when planning renewal interventions that minimize costs over their life cycles.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987strategic asset managementsustainabilitylife cyclelong-term planningrehabilitation strategy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stian Bruaset
Håkon Rygg
Sveinung Sægrov
spellingShingle Stian Bruaset
Håkon Rygg
Sveinung Sægrov
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
Sustainability
strategic asset management
sustainability
life cycle
long-term planning
rehabilitation strategy
author_facet Stian Bruaset
Håkon Rygg
Sveinung Sægrov
author_sort Stian Bruaset
title Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
title_short Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
title_full Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
title_fullStr Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
title_sort reviewing the long-term sustainability of urban water system rehabilitation strategies with an alternative approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-06-01
description It is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water infrastructure rehabilitation strategies, a life cycle approach for survival functions is suggested. A life cycle factor based on survival functions is introduced, which is a measuring value of the total expected service life of all pipes within a group of pipes. Another factor, termed the sustainability factor, is based on the relationship between the life cycle factor and a rehabilitation reference method, which makes it possible to correct the long-term performance of rehabilitation methods based on their expected service life provision. A case study presents the implications for investments in infrastructure rehabilitation when applying the sustainability factor in long-term planning, and shows the importance of considering the service life of rehabilitation methods when planning renewal interventions that minimize costs over their life cycles.
topic strategic asset management
sustainability
life cycle
long-term planning
rehabilitation strategy
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987
work_keys_str_mv AT stianbruaset reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach
AT hakonrygg reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach
AT sveinungsægrov reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach
_version_ 1725344905760342016