Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach
It is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water in...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987 |
id |
doaj-a13c43cff1a9428283c90a9304ffc629 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a13c43cff1a9428283c90a9304ffc6292020-11-25T00:26:18ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-06-01106198710.3390/su10061987su10061987Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative ApproachStian Bruaset0Håkon Rygg1Sveinung Sægrov2Department of Water and Environment, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayMulticonsult, 0276 Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Water and Environment, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayIt is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water infrastructure rehabilitation strategies, a life cycle approach for survival functions is suggested. A life cycle factor based on survival functions is introduced, which is a measuring value of the total expected service life of all pipes within a group of pipes. Another factor, termed the sustainability factor, is based on the relationship between the life cycle factor and a rehabilitation reference method, which makes it possible to correct the long-term performance of rehabilitation methods based on their expected service life provision. A case study presents the implications for investments in infrastructure rehabilitation when applying the sustainability factor in long-term planning, and shows the importance of considering the service life of rehabilitation methods when planning renewal interventions that minimize costs over their life cycles.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987strategic asset managementsustainabilitylife cyclelong-term planningrehabilitation strategy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stian Bruaset Håkon Rygg Sveinung Sægrov |
spellingShingle |
Stian Bruaset Håkon Rygg Sveinung Sægrov Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach Sustainability strategic asset management sustainability life cycle long-term planning rehabilitation strategy |
author_facet |
Stian Bruaset Håkon Rygg Sveinung Sægrov |
author_sort |
Stian Bruaset |
title |
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach |
title_short |
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach |
title_full |
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach |
title_fullStr |
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach |
title_sort |
reviewing the long-term sustainability of urban water system rehabilitation strategies with an alternative approach |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
It is generally difficult to assess the performance of an infrastructure with a substantially longer life span than economic models can handle, and the life cycle concepts in urban water systems are normally limited to single-asset projects. In order to explore the long-term impact of urban water infrastructure rehabilitation strategies, a life cycle approach for survival functions is suggested. A life cycle factor based on survival functions is introduced, which is a measuring value of the total expected service life of all pipes within a group of pipes. Another factor, termed the sustainability factor, is based on the relationship between the life cycle factor and a rehabilitation reference method, which makes it possible to correct the long-term performance of rehabilitation methods based on their expected service life provision. A case study presents the implications for investments in infrastructure rehabilitation when applying the sustainability factor in long-term planning, and shows the importance of considering the service life of rehabilitation methods when planning renewal interventions that minimize costs over their life cycles. |
topic |
strategic asset management sustainability life cycle long-term planning rehabilitation strategy |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1987 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stianbruaset reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach AT hakonrygg reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach AT sveinungsægrov reviewingthelongtermsustainabilityofurbanwatersystemrehabilitationstrategieswithanalternativeapproach |
_version_ |
1725344905760342016 |