Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes

Floral volatiles and reward traits are major drivers for the behavior of mutualistic as well as antagonistic flower visitors, i.e., pollinators and florivores. These floral traits differ tremendously between species, but intraspecific differences and their consequences on organism interactions remai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth J. Eilers, Sandra Kleine, Silvia Eckert, Simon Waldherr, Caroline Müller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.611877/full
id doaj-a12abe307d4c40b589bd4730bdffff5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a12abe307d4c40b589bd4730bdffff5a2021-01-20T06:19:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2021-01-011110.3389/fpls.2020.611877611877Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare ChemotypesElisabeth J. Eilers0Sandra Kleine1Silvia Eckert2Silvia Eckert3Simon Waldherr4Caroline Müller5Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, GermanyChemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, GermanyChemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, GermanyBiodiversity Research/Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyChemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, GermanyChemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, GermanyFloral volatiles and reward traits are major drivers for the behavior of mutualistic as well as antagonistic flower visitors, i.e., pollinators and florivores. These floral traits differ tremendously between species, but intraspecific differences and their consequences on organism interactions remain largely unknown. Floral volatile compounds, such as terpenoids, function as cues to advertise rewards to pollinators, but should at the same time also repel florivores. The reward composition, e.g., protein and lipid contents in pollen, differs between individuals of distinct plant families. Whether the nutritional value of rewards within the same plant species is linked to their chemotypes, which differ in their pattern of specialized metabolites, has yet not been investigated. In the present study, we compared Tanacetum vulgare plants of five terpenoid chemotypes with regard to flower production, floral headspace volatiles, pollen macronutrient and terpenoid content, and floral attractiveness to florivorous beetles. Our analyses revealed remarkable differences between the chemotypes in the amount and diameter of flower heads, duration of bloom period, and pollen nutritional quality. The floral headspace composition of pollen-producing mature flowers, but not of premature flowers, was correlated to that of pollen and leaves in the same plant individual. For two chemotypes, florivorous beetles discriminated between the scent of mature and premature flower heads and preferred the latter. In semi-field experiments, the abundance of florivorous beetles and flower tissue miners differed between T. vulgare chemotypes. Moreover, the scent environment affected the choice and beetles were more abundant in homogenous plots composed of one single chemotype than in plots with different neighboring chemotypes. In conclusion, flower production, floral metabolic composition and pollen quality varied to a remarkable extend within the species T. vulgare, and the attractiveness of floral scent differed also intra-individually with floral ontogeny. We found evidence for a trade-off between pollen lipid content and pollen amount on a per-plant-level. Our study highlights that chemotypes which are more susceptible to florivory are less attacked when they grow in the neighborhood of other chemotypes and thus gain a benefit from high overall chemodiversity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.611877/fullterpenoidsgas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)Asteraceaeprotein:lipid-ratioinsect behaviorPhalacridae
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elisabeth J. Eilers
Sandra Kleine
Silvia Eckert
Silvia Eckert
Simon Waldherr
Caroline Müller
spellingShingle Elisabeth J. Eilers
Sandra Kleine
Silvia Eckert
Silvia Eckert
Simon Waldherr
Caroline Müller
Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
Frontiers in Plant Science
terpenoids
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
Asteraceae
protein:lipid-ratio
insect behavior
Phalacridae
author_facet Elisabeth J. Eilers
Sandra Kleine
Silvia Eckert
Silvia Eckert
Simon Waldherr
Caroline Müller
author_sort Elisabeth J. Eilers
title Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
title_short Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
title_full Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
title_fullStr Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
title_full_unstemmed Flower Production, Headspace Volatiles, Pollen Nutrients, and Florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes
title_sort flower production, headspace volatiles, pollen nutrients, and florivory in tanacetum vulgare chemotypes
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Floral volatiles and reward traits are major drivers for the behavior of mutualistic as well as antagonistic flower visitors, i.e., pollinators and florivores. These floral traits differ tremendously between species, but intraspecific differences and their consequences on organism interactions remain largely unknown. Floral volatile compounds, such as terpenoids, function as cues to advertise rewards to pollinators, but should at the same time also repel florivores. The reward composition, e.g., protein and lipid contents in pollen, differs between individuals of distinct plant families. Whether the nutritional value of rewards within the same plant species is linked to their chemotypes, which differ in their pattern of specialized metabolites, has yet not been investigated. In the present study, we compared Tanacetum vulgare plants of five terpenoid chemotypes with regard to flower production, floral headspace volatiles, pollen macronutrient and terpenoid content, and floral attractiveness to florivorous beetles. Our analyses revealed remarkable differences between the chemotypes in the amount and diameter of flower heads, duration of bloom period, and pollen nutritional quality. The floral headspace composition of pollen-producing mature flowers, but not of premature flowers, was correlated to that of pollen and leaves in the same plant individual. For two chemotypes, florivorous beetles discriminated between the scent of mature and premature flower heads and preferred the latter. In semi-field experiments, the abundance of florivorous beetles and flower tissue miners differed between T. vulgare chemotypes. Moreover, the scent environment affected the choice and beetles were more abundant in homogenous plots composed of one single chemotype than in plots with different neighboring chemotypes. In conclusion, flower production, floral metabolic composition and pollen quality varied to a remarkable extend within the species T. vulgare, and the attractiveness of floral scent differed also intra-individually with floral ontogeny. We found evidence for a trade-off between pollen lipid content and pollen amount on a per-plant-level. Our study highlights that chemotypes which are more susceptible to florivory are less attacked when they grow in the neighborhood of other chemotypes and thus gain a benefit from high overall chemodiversity.
topic terpenoids
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
Asteraceae
protein:lipid-ratio
insect behavior
Phalacridae
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.611877/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethjeilers flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
AT sandrakleine flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
AT silviaeckert flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
AT silviaeckert flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
AT simonwaldherr flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
AT carolinemuller flowerproductionheadspacevolatilespollennutrientsandflorivoryintanacetumvulgarechemotypes
_version_ 1724331272903327744