A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration
Restoring degraded forests and agricultural lands has become a global conservation priority. A growing number of tools can quantify ecosystem service tradeoffs associated with forest restoration. This evolving “tools landscape” presents a dilemma: more tools are available, but selecting appropriat...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Forest Ecosystems |
Online Access: | http://forestecosyst.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40663-016-0062-y |
id |
doaj-a119fc24c9a34c66a4d18f6c3db44e9a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a119fc24c9a34c66a4d18f6c3db44e9a2020-11-25T00:13:46ZengSpringerOpenForest Ecosystems2095-63552197-56202016-02-01310.1186/s40663-016-0062-yA decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restorationZachary L. Christin0Kenneth J. Bagstad1Michael A. Verdone2Earth Economics, 107 N Tacoma Ave, Tacoma, WA 98403, USAU.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences & Environmental Change Science Center, Box 25046, MS 980, Denver, CO 80225, USAInternational Union for the Conservation of Nature, 1630 Connecticut Ave. NW #300, Washington, DC20009, USARestoring degraded forests and agricultural lands has become a global conservation priority. A growing number of tools can quantify ecosystem service tradeoffs associated with forest restoration. This evolving “tools landscape” presents a dilemma: more tools are available, but selecting appropriate tools has become more challenging. We present a Restoration Ecosystem Service Tool Selector (RESTS) framework that describes key characteristics of 13 ecosystem service assessment tools. Analysts enter information about their decision context, services to be analyzed, and desired outputs. Tools are filtered and presented based on five evaluative criteria: scalability, cost, time requirements, handling of uncertainty, and applicability to benefit-cost analysis. RESTS uses a spreadsheet interface but a web-based interface is planned. Given the rapid evolution of ecosystem services science, RESTS provides an adaptable framework to guide forest restoration decision makers toward tools that can help quantify ecosystem services in support of restoration. Keywords: Decision support, Ecosystem services, Forest restoration, Modeling, Valuation, Comparative tools assessmenthttp://forestecosyst.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40663-016-0062-y |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zachary L. Christin Kenneth J. Bagstad Michael A. Verdone |
spellingShingle |
Zachary L. Christin Kenneth J. Bagstad Michael A. Verdone A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration Forest Ecosystems |
author_facet |
Zachary L. Christin Kenneth J. Bagstad Michael A. Verdone |
author_sort |
Zachary L. Christin |
title |
A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
title_short |
A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
title_full |
A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
title_fullStr |
A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
title_full_unstemmed |
A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
title_sort |
decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Forest Ecosystems |
issn |
2095-6355 2197-5620 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
Restoring degraded forests and agricultural lands has become a global conservation priority. A growing number of
tools can quantify ecosystem service tradeoffs associated with forest restoration. This evolving “tools landscape”
presents a dilemma: more tools are available, but selecting appropriate tools has become more challenging.
We present a Restoration Ecosystem Service Tool Selector (RESTS) framework that describes key characteristics
of 13 ecosystem service assessment tools. Analysts enter information about their decision context, services to be
analyzed, and desired outputs. Tools are filtered and presented based on five evaluative criteria: scalability, cost,
time requirements, handling of uncertainty, and applicability to benefit-cost analysis. RESTS uses a spreadsheet
interface but a web-based interface is planned. Given the rapid evolution of ecosystem services science, RESTS
provides an adaptable framework to guide forest restoration decision makers toward tools that can help quantify
ecosystem services in support of restoration.
Keywords: Decision support, Ecosystem services, Forest restoration, Modeling, Valuation, Comparative tools
assessment |
url |
http://forestecosyst.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40663-016-0062-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zacharylchristin adecisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration AT kennethjbagstad adecisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration AT michaelaverdone adecisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration AT zacharylchristin decisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration AT kennethjbagstad decisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration AT michaelaverdone decisionframeworkforidentifyingmodelstoestimateforestecosystemservicesgainsfromrestoration |
_version_ |
1725393131429429248 |