Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study

In 1986 two American cultural anthropologists, George E. Marcus and M. J. Fisher, published Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An experimental moment in the human sciences where they reflected on the discipline as it presented itself in the penultimate decade of the 20th century. It appears, they a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic Society 2020-05-01
Series:Studia Semiotyczne
Online Access:http://studiasemiotyczne.pts.edu.pl/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/175
id doaj-a10950ad01bb40e5b70904c6e55230d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a10950ad01bb40e5b70904c6e55230d42021-02-22T18:27:02ZengPolskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic SocietyStudia Semiotyczne0137-66082544-073X2020-05-01271Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study In 1986 two American cultural anthropologists, George E. Marcus and M. J. Fisher, published Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An experimental moment in the human sciences where they reflected on the discipline as it presented itself in the penultimate decade of the 20th century. It appears, they argued, that the field was experiencing a crisis of representation that causes unsettling troubles with narrative depiction of the cultural reality. Empirically driven humanities (including cultural anthropology) apply ”abstract, generalizing frameworks” with specific ”paradigmatic style,” which results in depicting the said reality in an incomplete manner. The problem was, they said, that ”macro” level of generalizing concepts and ”micro” level of cultural phenomena were incommensurate. http://studiasemiotyczne.pts.edu.pl/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/175
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
spellingShingle Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
Studia Semiotyczne
title_short Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
title_full Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
title_fullStr Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
title_full_unstemmed Thick Description and the Crisis of Representation – an Anthropological Study
title_sort thick description and the crisis of representation – an anthropological study
publisher Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic Society
series Studia Semiotyczne
issn 0137-6608
2544-073X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description In 1986 two American cultural anthropologists, George E. Marcus and M. J. Fisher, published Anthropology as Cultural Critique. An experimental moment in the human sciences where they reflected on the discipline as it presented itself in the penultimate decade of the 20th century. It appears, they argued, that the field was experiencing a crisis of representation that causes unsettling troubles with narrative depiction of the cultural reality. Empirically driven humanities (including cultural anthropology) apply ”abstract, generalizing frameworks” with specific ”paradigmatic style,” which results in depicting the said reality in an incomplete manner. The problem was, they said, that ”macro” level of generalizing concepts and ”micro” level of cultural phenomena were incommensurate.
url http://studiasemiotyczne.pts.edu.pl/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/175
_version_ 1724256411139964928