The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government
The Cosmopolitan idea of the World Government is quite rarely proposed in theory of international relations. Kant already claimed that this idea oscillates between anarchy and brute despotism. This is the reason why he described this standpoint as naive. The author tries to show that alternative the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2008/0353-57380802161P.pdf |
id |
doaj-a1079a8b208348d594364b7d706128ba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a1079a8b208348d594364b7d706128ba2020-11-24T22:22:38ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382008-01-0119216118910.2298/FID0802161PThe classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world governmentPrelević DuškoThe Cosmopolitan idea of the World Government is quite rarely proposed in theory of international relations. Kant already claimed that this idea oscillates between anarchy and brute despotism. This is the reason why he described this standpoint as naive. The author tries to show that alternative theories, such as realism, Kantian and Rawlsian versions of statism and the conception of multilayered scheme of sovereignty, lead to more serious problems. The first one is rejected for the reason of the 'prisoner's dilemma' it implies. It is also argued that the Kantian version of statism is either inconsistent, or allows for totalitarian states if they have peaceful international politics. Many liberals reject Rawls's position because of his tolerant attitude towards 'decent peoples'. On the other hand, the conception of multilayered scheme of sovereignty is dismissed because of the non-existence of a unified decision-making procedure in global politics. At the end of the paper, the author defends Classical Cosmopolitanism theory from Kant's objections and indicates the main obstacles to its realization. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2008/0353-57380802161P.pdfclassical cosmopolitanismrealismprisoner's dilemmamultilayered scheme of sovereigntystatismdecent people |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Prelević Duško |
spellingShingle |
Prelević Duško The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government Filozofija i Društvo classical cosmopolitanism realism prisoner's dilemma multilayered scheme of sovereignty statism decent people |
author_facet |
Prelević Duško |
author_sort |
Prelević Duško |
title |
The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government |
title_short |
The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government |
title_full |
The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government |
title_fullStr |
The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government |
title_full_unstemmed |
The classical cosmopolitanian idea: Arguments for the world government |
title_sort |
classical cosmopolitanian idea: arguments for the world government |
publisher |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade |
series |
Filozofija i Društvo |
issn |
0353-5738 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
The Cosmopolitan idea of the World Government is quite rarely proposed in theory of international relations. Kant already claimed that this idea oscillates between anarchy and brute despotism. This is the reason why he described this standpoint as naive. The author tries to show that alternative theories, such as realism, Kantian and Rawlsian versions of statism and the conception of multilayered scheme of sovereignty, lead to more serious problems. The first one is rejected for the reason of the 'prisoner's dilemma' it implies. It is also argued that the Kantian version of statism is either inconsistent, or allows for totalitarian states if they have peaceful international politics. Many liberals reject Rawls's position because of his tolerant attitude towards 'decent peoples'. On the other hand, the conception of multilayered scheme of sovereignty is dismissed because of the non-existence of a unified decision-making procedure in global politics. At the end of the paper, the author defends Classical Cosmopolitanism theory from Kant's objections and indicates the main obstacles to its realization. |
topic |
classical cosmopolitanism realism prisoner's dilemma multilayered scheme of sovereignty statism decent people |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2008/0353-57380802161P.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT prelevicdusko theclassicalcosmopolitanianideaargumentsfortheworldgovernment AT prelevicdusko classicalcosmopolitanianideaargumentsfortheworldgovernment |
_version_ |
1725767408139894784 |