Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Background/Aims It is unclear whether continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injection of propofol is better for achieving adequate sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injectio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Gon Lee, Kyo-Sang Yoo, Young Jae Byun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-11-01
Series:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2018-233.pdf
id doaj-a0f9398964904eb9833e402f0829c164
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0f9398964904eb9833e402f0829c1642021-08-10T06:27:51ZengThe Korean Association of Internal MedicineThe Korean Journal of Internal Medicine1226-33032005-66482020-11-013561338134510.3904/kjim.2018.233170330Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyJae Gon Lee0Kyo-Sang Yoo1Young Jae Byun2 Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, KoreaBackground/Aims It is unclear whether continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injection of propofol is better for achieving adequate sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injection of propofol during therapeutic ERCP. Methods In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 232 patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP to either continuous infusion (CI group, n = 113) or intermittent bolus injection (BI group, n = 119) of propofol. The primary outcome was the quality of sedation as assessed by the endoscopist. Other sedation-related parameters included sedation induction time, total dose of propofol, recovery time, involuntary patient movement, and adverse events. Results Overall satisfaction with sedation by the endoscopist and monitoring nurse were significantly higher in the CI group than the BI group (mean satisfaction score, 9.66 vs. 8.0 and 9.47 vs. 7.96, respectively, p < 0.01 for both). However, patients in the CI group had a significantly longer sedation induction time (5.28 minutes vs. 4.34 minutes, p < 0.01) and received a higher dose of propofol than patients in the BI group (4.22 mg/kg vs. 2.08 mg/kg, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions Continuous infusion of propofol during therapeutic ERCP had the advantage over intermittent bolus injection of maintaining a constant level of sedation without increasing adverse events. However, it was associated with an increased total dose of propofol and prolonged sedation induction time.http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2018-233.pdfpropofoldeep sedationendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jae Gon Lee
Kyo-Sang Yoo
Young Jae Byun
spellingShingle Jae Gon Lee
Kyo-Sang Yoo
Young Jae Byun
Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
propofol
deep sedation
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
author_facet Jae Gon Lee
Kyo-Sang Yoo
Young Jae Byun
author_sort Jae Gon Lee
title Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
title_short Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
title_full Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
title_fullStr Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
title_full_unstemmed Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
title_sort continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
series The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
issn 1226-3303
2005-6648
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Background/Aims It is unclear whether continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injection of propofol is better for achieving adequate sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injection of propofol during therapeutic ERCP. Methods In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 232 patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP to either continuous infusion (CI group, n = 113) or intermittent bolus injection (BI group, n = 119) of propofol. The primary outcome was the quality of sedation as assessed by the endoscopist. Other sedation-related parameters included sedation induction time, total dose of propofol, recovery time, involuntary patient movement, and adverse events. Results Overall satisfaction with sedation by the endoscopist and monitoring nurse were significantly higher in the CI group than the BI group (mean satisfaction score, 9.66 vs. 8.0 and 9.47 vs. 7.96, respectively, p < 0.01 for both). However, patients in the CI group had a significantly longer sedation induction time (5.28 minutes vs. 4.34 minutes, p < 0.01) and received a higher dose of propofol than patients in the BI group (4.22 mg/kg vs. 2.08 mg/kg, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions Continuous infusion of propofol during therapeutic ERCP had the advantage over intermittent bolus injection of maintaining a constant level of sedation without increasing adverse events. However, it was associated with an increased total dose of propofol and prolonged sedation induction time.
topic propofol
deep sedation
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
url http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2018-233.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jaegonlee continuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusinjectionofpropofolduringendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography
AT kyosangyoo continuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusinjectionofpropofolduringendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography
AT youngjaebyun continuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusinjectionofpropofolduringendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography
_version_ 1721212806182731776