Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus injection of propofol during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

• Main Authors: Jae Gon Lee, Kyo-Sang Yoo, Young Jae Byun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-11-01
• Series: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
• Subjects: propofol; deep sedation; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
• Online Access: http://www.kjim.org/upload/pdf/kjim-2018-233.pdf
• ISSN: 1226-3303; 2005-6648

Background/Aims It is unclear whether continuous infusion or intermittent bolus injection of propofol is better for achieving adequate sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus injection of propofol during therapeutic ERCP. Methods In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 232 patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP to either continuous infusion (CI group, n = 113) or intermittent bolus injection (BI group, n = 119) of propofol. The primary outcome was the quality of sedation as assessed by the endoscopist. Other sedation-related parameters included sedation induction time, total dose of propofol, recovery time, involuntary patient movement, and adverse events. Results Overall satisfaction with sedation by the endoscopist and monitoring nurse were significantly higher in the CI group than the BI group (mean satisfaction score, 9.66 vs. 8.0 and 9.47 vs. 7.96, respectively, p < 0.01 for both). However, patients in the CI group had a significantly longer sedation induction time (5.28 minutes vs. 4.34 minutes, p < 0.01) and received a higher dose of propofol than patients in the BI group (4.22 mg/kg vs. 2.08 mg/kg, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions Continuous infusion of propofol during therapeutic ERCP had the advantage over intermittent bolus injection of maintaining a constant level of sedation without increasing adverse events. However, it was associated with an increased total dose of propofol and prolonged sedation induction time.