Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp
Objectives. To measure the temperature increase induced during thermocure lamp setting reaction of glass carbomer and to compare it with those induced by visible light curing of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Metho...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5173805 |
id |
doaj-a0f49653832b428a8c12f91ff42184cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0f49653832b428a8c12f91ff42184cc2020-11-24T22:43:25ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412016-01-01201610.1155/2016/51738055173805Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure LampFirdevs Kahvecioglu0Gül Tosun1Hayriye Esra Ülker2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, TurkeyDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, TurkeyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, TurkeyObjectives. To measure the temperature increase induced during thermocure lamp setting reaction of glass carbomer and to compare it with those induced by visible light curing of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Methods. Nonretentive class I cavities were prepared in extracted primary and permanent molars. Glass carbomer (GC) was placed in the cavity and set at 60°C for 60 sn using a special thermocure lamp. Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) were placed in the cavities and polymerized with an LED curing unit. Temperature increases during setting reactions were measured with a J-type thermocouple wire connected to a data logger. Data were examined using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests. Results. The use of GC resulted in temperature changes of 5.17 ± 0.92°C and 5.32 ± 0.90°C in primary and permanent teeth, respectively (p>0.05). Temperature increases were greatest in the GC group, differing significantly from those in the PMCR group (p<0.05). Conclusion. Temperature increases during polymerization and setting reactions of the materials were below the critical value in all groups. No difference was observed between primary and permanent teeth, regardless of the material used.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5173805 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Firdevs Kahvecioglu Gül Tosun Hayriye Esra Ülker |
spellingShingle |
Firdevs Kahvecioglu Gül Tosun Hayriye Esra Ülker Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Firdevs Kahvecioglu Gül Tosun Hayriye Esra Ülker |
author_sort |
Firdevs Kahvecioglu |
title |
Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp |
title_short |
Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp |
title_full |
Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp |
title_fullStr |
Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp |
title_sort |
intrapulpal thermal changes during setting reaction of glass carbomer® using thermocure lamp |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Objectives. To measure the temperature increase induced during thermocure lamp setting reaction of glass carbomer and to compare it with those induced by visible light curing of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Methods. Nonretentive class I cavities were prepared in extracted primary and permanent molars. Glass carbomer (GC) was placed in the cavity and set at 60°C for 60 sn using a special thermocure lamp. Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) were placed in the cavities and polymerized with an LED curing unit. Temperature increases during setting reactions were measured with a J-type thermocouple wire connected to a data logger. Data were examined using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests. Results. The use of GC resulted in temperature changes of 5.17 ± 0.92°C and 5.32 ± 0.90°C in primary and permanent teeth, respectively (p>0.05). Temperature increases were greatest in the GC group, differing significantly from those in the PMCR group (p<0.05). Conclusion. Temperature increases during polymerization and setting reactions of the materials were below the critical value in all groups. No difference was observed between primary and permanent teeth, regardless of the material used. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5173805 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT firdevskahvecioglu intrapulpalthermalchangesduringsettingreactionofglasscarbomerusingthermocurelamp AT gultosun intrapulpalthermalchangesduringsettingreactionofglasscarbomerusingthermocurelamp AT hayriyeesraulker intrapulpalthermalchangesduringsettingreactionofglasscarbomerusingthermocurelamp |
_version_ |
1725696084793098240 |