“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as “women politicians.” We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their “women politicians” identity. When...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Europe's Journal of Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1557 |
id |
doaj-a0ebc7cc4b0142698e8b9d1996788293 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0ebc7cc4b0142698e8b9d19967882932020-11-25T02:57:36ZengPsychOpenEurope's Journal of Psychology1841-04132019-09-0115345947810.5964/ejop.v15i3.1557ejop.v15i3.1557“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional IdentityPatrizia Milesi0Augusta Isabella Alberici1Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyThis paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as “women politicians.” We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their “women politicians” identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented “women politicians” as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their “women politicians” identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the “women politicians” intersectional identity.http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1557intersectional identitypoliticized identitygender discrimination in politicswomen politicianswomen politicians’ competence |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patrizia Milesi Augusta Isabella Alberici |
spellingShingle |
Patrizia Milesi Augusta Isabella Alberici “Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity Europe's Journal of Psychology intersectional identity politicized identity gender discrimination in politics women politicians women politicians’ competence |
author_facet |
Patrizia Milesi Augusta Isabella Alberici |
author_sort |
Patrizia Milesi |
title |
“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity |
title_short |
“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity |
title_full |
“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity |
title_fullStr |
“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Frontrunners”: An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of “Women Politicians” Intersectional Identity |
title_sort |
“frontrunners”: an investigation of the discursive construction of “women politicians” intersectional identity |
publisher |
PsychOpen |
series |
Europe's Journal of Psychology |
issn |
1841-0413 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as “women politicians.” We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their “women politicians” identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented “women politicians” as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their “women politicians” identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the “women politicians” intersectional identity. |
topic |
intersectional identity politicized identity gender discrimination in politics women politicians women politicians’ competence |
url |
http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1557 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patriziamilesi frontrunnersaninvestigationofthediscursiveconstructionofwomenpoliticiansintersectionalidentity AT augustaisabellaalberici frontrunnersaninvestigationofthediscursiveconstructionofwomenpoliticiansintersectionalidentity |
_version_ |
1724710300446359552 |