Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-10-01
|
Series: | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
Online Access: | http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18 |
id |
doaj-a0e9bf0464b04e5088d1b71ae4dfbe75 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0e9bf0464b04e5088d1b71ae4dfbe752020-11-24T21:14:32ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2009-10-01411810.1186/1747-597X-4-18Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disordersPincus Harold ADausey David JHerrell James M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective of whether they seek care in mental health systems or substance abuse systems or both.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We convened an expert panel and asked them to rate a series of structure, process, and outcomes measures for COD using a structured evaluation tool with domains for importance, usefulness, validity, and practicality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose twelve measures that demonstrated promise for future pilot testing and refinement. The criteria that we applied to select these measures included: balance across structure, process, and outcome measures, quantitative ratings from the panelists, narrative comments from the panelists, and evidence the measure had been tested in a similar form elsewhere.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>To be successful performance measures need to be developed in such a way that they align with needs of administrators and providers. Policymakers need to work with all stakeholders to establish a concrete agenda for developing, piloting and implementing performance measures that include COD. Future research could begin to consider strategies that increase our ability to use administrative coding in mental health and substance use disorder systems to efficiently capture quality relevant clinical data.</p> http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pincus Harold A Dausey David J Herrell James M |
spellingShingle |
Pincus Harold A Dausey David J Herrell James M Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
author_facet |
Pincus Harold A Dausey David J Herrell James M |
author_sort |
Pincus Harold A |
title |
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
title_short |
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
title_full |
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
title_fullStr |
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
title_sort |
performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy |
issn |
1747-597X |
publishDate |
2009-10-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective of whether they seek care in mental health systems or substance abuse systems or both.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We convened an expert panel and asked them to rate a series of structure, process, and outcomes measures for COD using a structured evaluation tool with domains for importance, usefulness, validity, and practicality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose twelve measures that demonstrated promise for future pilot testing and refinement. The criteria that we applied to select these measures included: balance across structure, process, and outcome measures, quantitative ratings from the panelists, narrative comments from the panelists, and evidence the measure had been tested in a similar form elsewhere.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>To be successful performance measures need to be developed in such a way that they align with needs of administrators and providers. Policymakers need to work with all stakeholders to establish a concrete agenda for developing, piloting and implementing performance measures that include COD. Future research could begin to consider strategies that increase our ability to use administrative coding in mental health and substance use disorder systems to efficiently capture quality relevant clinical data.</p> |
url |
http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pincusharolda performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders AT dauseydavidj performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders AT herrelljamesm performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders |
_version_ |
1716746857550446592 |