Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pincus Harold A, Dausey David J, Herrell James M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Online Access:http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18
id doaj-a0e9bf0464b04e5088d1b71ae4dfbe75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0e9bf0464b04e5088d1b71ae4dfbe752020-11-24T21:14:32ZengBMCSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy1747-597X2009-10-01411810.1186/1747-597X-4-18Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disordersPincus Harold ADausey David JHerrell James M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective of whether they seek care in mental health systems or substance abuse systems or both.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We convened an expert panel and asked them to rate a series of structure, process, and outcomes measures for COD using a structured evaluation tool with domains for importance, usefulness, validity, and practicality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose twelve measures that demonstrated promise for future pilot testing and refinement. The criteria that we applied to select these measures included: balance across structure, process, and outcome measures, quantitative ratings from the panelists, narrative comments from the panelists, and evidence the measure had been tested in a similar form elsewhere.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>To be successful performance measures need to be developed in such a way that they align with needs of administrators and providers. Policymakers need to work with all stakeholders to establish a concrete agenda for developing, piloting and implementing performance measures that include COD. Future research could begin to consider strategies that increase our ability to use administrative coding in mental health and substance use disorder systems to efficiently capture quality relevant clinical data.</p> http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pincus Harold A
Dausey David J
Herrell James M
spellingShingle Pincus Harold A
Dausey David J
Herrell James M
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
author_facet Pincus Harold A
Dausey David J
Herrell James M
author_sort Pincus Harold A
title Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
title_short Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
title_full Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
title_fullStr Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
title_full_unstemmed Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
title_sort performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders
publisher BMC
series Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
issn 1747-597X
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders (COD) are the norm rather than the exception. It is therefore critical that performance measures are developed to assess the quality of care for individuals with COD irrespective of whether they seek care in mental health systems or substance abuse systems or both.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We convened an expert panel and asked them to rate a series of structure, process, and outcomes measures for COD using a structured evaluation tool with domains for importance, usefulness, validity, and practicality.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We chose twelve measures that demonstrated promise for future pilot testing and refinement. The criteria that we applied to select these measures included: balance across structure, process, and outcome measures, quantitative ratings from the panelists, narrative comments from the panelists, and evidence the measure had been tested in a similar form elsewhere.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>To be successful performance measures need to be developed in such a way that they align with needs of administrators and providers. Policymakers need to work with all stakeholders to establish a concrete agenda for developing, piloting and implementing performance measures that include COD. Future research could begin to consider strategies that increase our ability to use administrative coding in mental health and substance use disorder systems to efficiently capture quality relevant clinical data.</p>
url http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/4/1/18
work_keys_str_mv AT pincusharolda performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders
AT dauseydavidj performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders
AT herrelljamesm performancemeasurementforcooccurringmentalhealthandsubstanceusedisorders
_version_ 1716746857550446592