Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating
Background and Aims: The objective of this study was the development of a checklist for assessment of students’ clinical skills in the clinical oral medicine. The second aim was the assessment of stake holders’ satisfaction of this checklist in comparison to the routine global ra...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dental Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-840&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
id |
doaj-a0cac00b41b34e0a8d5144fb7de75584 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0cac00b41b34e0a8d5144fb7de755842020-11-24T21:24:58ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442017-02-01293169176Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global ratingArash Mansourian0Shiva Shirazian1Mohammad Jalili2Mehdi Vatanpour3Leila Pour Momen Arabi4 Associated Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Associated Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Dentist Background and Aims: The objective of this study was the development of a checklist for assessment of students’ clinical skills in the clinical oral medicine. The second aim was the assessment of stake holders’ satisfaction of this checklist in comparison to the routine global rating method. Materials and Methods: The checklist was developed in an expert panel sessions and the validity and reliability of checklist were assessed by CVI and test-retest method, respectively. All students (n=66) were assessed in 2 groups, one with developed checklist and another with global rating. At the end of the session, the satisfaction’s level of staff and students were analysized using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test and the mean scores of students were analysized using Paired T test. Results: Content validity index (CV I) of checklist was 0.88. Reliability of checklist confirmed with high correlation coefficient (0.9). Staffs’ satisfaction had no significant difference between the two methods (Wilcoxon P=0.06). The mean score of students who assessed by checklist was higher than global rating with no significant differences (P=0.06). Conclusion: Regarding the higher students’ satisfaction from checklist and more attention to component of assessment and more objectivity of this method and also higher score in checklist, it seems that the use of a checklist is more proper method for assessing the students’ clinical skills.http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-840&slc_lang=en&sid=1Checklist Clinical skills Educational assessment Staffs’ satisfaction Students’ satisfaction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Arash Mansourian Shiva Shirazian Mohammad Jalili Mehdi Vatanpour Leila Pour Momen Arabi |
spellingShingle |
Arash Mansourian Shiva Shirazian Mohammad Jalili Mehdi Vatanpour Leila Pour Momen Arabi Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating Journal of Dental Medicine Checklist Clinical skills Educational assessment Staffs’ satisfaction Students’ satisfaction |
author_facet |
Arash Mansourian Shiva Shirazian Mohammad Jalili Mehdi Vatanpour Leila Pour Momen Arabi |
author_sort |
Arash Mansourian |
title |
Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
title_short |
Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
title_full |
Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
title_fullStr |
Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
title_full_unstemmed |
Checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
title_sort |
checklist development for assessing the dental students\' clinical skills in oral and maxillofacial medicine course and comparison with global rating |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Dental Medicine |
issn |
1024-641X 2008-2444 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
Background and Aims: The objective of this study was the development of a checklist for assessment of students’ clinical skills in the clinical oral medicine. The second aim was the assessment of stake holders’ satisfaction of this checklist in comparison to the routine global rating method.
Materials and Methods: The checklist was developed in an expert panel sessions and the validity and reliability of checklist were assessed by CVI and test-retest method, respectively. All students (n=66) were assessed in 2 groups, one with developed checklist and another with global rating. At the end of the session, the satisfaction’s level of staff and students were analysized using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test and the mean scores of students were analysized using Paired T test.
Results: Content validity index (CV I) of checklist was 0.88. Reliability of checklist confirmed with high correlation coefficient (0.9). Staffs’ satisfaction had no significant difference between the two methods
(Wilcoxon P=0.06). The mean score of students who assessed by checklist was higher than global rating with no significant differences (P=0.06).
Conclusion: Regarding the higher students’ satisfaction from checklist and more attention to component of assessment and more objectivity of this method and also higher score in checklist, it seems that the use of a checklist is more proper method for assessing the students’ clinical skills. |
topic |
Checklist Clinical skills Educational assessment Staffs’ satisfaction Students’ satisfaction |
url |
http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-840&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arashmansourian checklistdevelopmentforassessingthedentalstudentsclinicalskillsinoralandmaxillofacialmedicinecourseandcomparisonwithglobalrating AT shivashirazian checklistdevelopmentforassessingthedentalstudentsclinicalskillsinoralandmaxillofacialmedicinecourseandcomparisonwithglobalrating AT mohammadjalili checklistdevelopmentforassessingthedentalstudentsclinicalskillsinoralandmaxillofacialmedicinecourseandcomparisonwithglobalrating AT mehdivatanpour checklistdevelopmentforassessingthedentalstudentsclinicalskillsinoralandmaxillofacialmedicinecourseandcomparisonwithglobalrating AT leilapourmomenarabi checklistdevelopmentforassessingthedentalstudentsclinicalskillsinoralandmaxillofacialmedicinecourseandcomparisonwithglobalrating |
_version_ |
1725985750858596352 |