Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the association between e-cigarette use and subsequent initiation or recurrence of cigarette smoking. Data sources A systematic literature search was finalised on 11 November 2019 using PubMed (including MEDLINE), EMBASE, Co...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
European Respiratory Society
2021-07-01
|
Series: | ERJ Open Research |
Online Access: | http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00976-2020.full |
id |
doaj-a0ca0c6e0ef9454fa80dea66b61ff773 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a0ca0c6e0ef9454fa80dea66b61ff7732021-10-04T13:41:21ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyERJ Open Research2312-05412021-07-017310.1183/23120541.00976-202000976-2020Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysisLouise Adermark0Maria Rosaria Galanti1Charlotta Ryk2Hans Gilljam3Linnea Hedman4 Dept of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Dept of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU), Stockholm, Sweden Dept of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Dept of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division Sustainable health, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the association between e-cigarette use and subsequent initiation or recurrence of cigarette smoking. Data sources A systematic literature search was finalised on 11 November 2019 using PubMed (including MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed Health, NICE Evidence Search, PROSPERO, CRD and PsycInfo. Study selection Studies were included if meeting the following criteria: reporting empirical results; longitudinal observational design with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up; including general population samples; allowing for the comparison between users and nonusers of e-cigarettes. Studies rated as having high risk of bias were excluded. Studies were independently assessed by at least two authors. The procedures described by PRISMA were followed, and the quality of evidence was rated using GRADE. Data synthesis 30 longitudinal studies from 22 different cohorts assessing e-cigarette use among nonsmokers or never-smokers at baseline, and subsequent use of cigarette smoking at follow-up, were included in this review. A random-effects meta-analysis based on 89 076 participants showed a pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of cigarette smoking among baseline nonsmoker e-cigarette users compared with nonusers of 4.68 (CI 3.64–6.02), while the adjusted OR was 3.37 (CI 2.68–4.24). These results were consistent irrespective of whether the outcome was measured as ever-smoking or as past 30-day smoking. The evidence was graded as moderate. Conclusions Use of e-cigarettes may predict the initiation or recurrence of cigarette smoking.http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00976-2020.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Louise Adermark Maria Rosaria Galanti Charlotta Ryk Hans Gilljam Linnea Hedman |
spellingShingle |
Louise Adermark Maria Rosaria Galanti Charlotta Ryk Hans Gilljam Linnea Hedman Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis ERJ Open Research |
author_facet |
Louise Adermark Maria Rosaria Galanti Charlotta Ryk Hans Gilljam Linnea Hedman |
author_sort |
Louise Adermark |
title |
Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
prospective association between use of electronic cigarettes and use of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
European Respiratory Society |
series |
ERJ Open Research |
issn |
2312-0541 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Objective
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the association between e-cigarette use and subsequent initiation or recurrence of cigarette smoking.
Data sources
A systematic literature search was finalised on 11 November 2019 using PubMed (including MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed Health, NICE Evidence Search, PROSPERO, CRD and PsycInfo.
Study selection
Studies were included if meeting the following criteria: reporting empirical results; longitudinal observational design with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up; including general population samples; allowing for the comparison between users and nonusers of e-cigarettes. Studies rated as having high risk of bias were excluded. Studies were independently assessed by at least two authors. The procedures described by PRISMA were followed, and the quality of evidence was rated using GRADE.
Data synthesis
30 longitudinal studies from 22 different cohorts assessing e-cigarette use among nonsmokers or never-smokers at baseline, and subsequent use of cigarette smoking at follow-up, were included in this review. A random-effects meta-analysis based on 89 076 participants showed a pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of cigarette smoking among baseline nonsmoker e-cigarette users compared with nonusers of 4.68 (CI 3.64–6.02), while the adjusted OR was 3.37 (CI 2.68–4.24). These results were consistent irrespective of whether the outcome was measured as ever-smoking or as past 30-day smoking. The evidence was graded as moderate.
Conclusions
Use of e-cigarettes may predict the initiation or recurrence of cigarette smoking. |
url |
http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00976-2020.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT louiseadermark prospectiveassociationbetweenuseofelectroniccigarettesanduseofconventionalcigarettesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mariarosariagalanti prospectiveassociationbetweenuseofelectroniccigarettesanduseofconventionalcigarettesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT charlottaryk prospectiveassociationbetweenuseofelectroniccigarettesanduseofconventionalcigarettesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hansgilljam prospectiveassociationbetweenuseofelectroniccigarettesanduseofconventionalcigarettesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linneahedman prospectiveassociationbetweenuseofelectroniccigarettesanduseofconventionalcigarettesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1716844070843711488 |