A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein

An 85-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a pacemaker pocket infection. A permanent pacemaker had been implanted via the right subclavian vein. The pacemaker and pacing leads were removed and a temporary pacemaker was implanted. After vancomycin treatment for 4 weeks, pacemaker implantati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tetsuo Yamaguchi, MD, Takamichi Miyamoto, MD, Yasuteru Yamauchi, MD, Tohru Obayashi, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-04-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427615001118
id doaj-a0c33537b16743d9bae3d97ab3bed27d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0c33537b16743d9bae3d97ab3bed27d2020-11-24T23:40:55ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42762016-04-0132215115310.1016/j.joa.2015.08.004A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac veinTetsuo Yamaguchi, MDTakamichi Miyamoto, MDYasuteru Yamauchi, MDTohru Obayashi, MDAn 85-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a pacemaker pocket infection. A permanent pacemaker had been implanted via the right subclavian vein. The pacemaker and pacing leads were removed and a temporary pacemaker was implanted. After vancomycin treatment for 4 weeks, pacemaker implantation via the right external iliac vein was performed under local anesthesia because of left subclavian vein occlusion, infection of the right pocket, and difficulty with epicardial lead insertion. The iliac vein approach is an effective alternative in patients in whom the pectoral approach cannot be used. Learning objective: Permanent pacemaker implantation using the conventional pectoral approach is impossible or contraindicated in 1–6% of patients. In such patients, implantation via the iliac vein is considered an effective alternative. The advantages of this approach are that the wound size and bleeding amount are very small and that it can be performed under local anesthesia. Therefore, this approach can be used in patients with a poor general condition, including elderly patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427615001118Permanent pacemaker implantationIliac veinPocket infectionSubclavian vein occlusionLocal anesthesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tetsuo Yamaguchi, MD
Takamichi Miyamoto, MD
Yasuteru Yamauchi, MD
Tohru Obayashi, MD
spellingShingle Tetsuo Yamaguchi, MD
Takamichi Miyamoto, MD
Yasuteru Yamauchi, MD
Tohru Obayashi, MD
A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
Journal of Arrhythmia
Permanent pacemaker implantation
Iliac vein
Pocket infection
Subclavian vein occlusion
Local anesthesia
author_facet Tetsuo Yamaguchi, MD
Takamichi Miyamoto, MD
Yasuteru Yamauchi, MD
Tohru Obayashi, MD
author_sort Tetsuo Yamaguchi, MD
title A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
title_short A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
title_full A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
title_fullStr A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
title_full_unstemmed A case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
title_sort case report of successful permanent pacemaker implantation via the iliac vein
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Arrhythmia
issn 1880-4276
publishDate 2016-04-01
description An 85-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a pacemaker pocket infection. A permanent pacemaker had been implanted via the right subclavian vein. The pacemaker and pacing leads were removed and a temporary pacemaker was implanted. After vancomycin treatment for 4 weeks, pacemaker implantation via the right external iliac vein was performed under local anesthesia because of left subclavian vein occlusion, infection of the right pocket, and difficulty with epicardial lead insertion. The iliac vein approach is an effective alternative in patients in whom the pectoral approach cannot be used. Learning objective: Permanent pacemaker implantation using the conventional pectoral approach is impossible or contraindicated in 1–6% of patients. In such patients, implantation via the iliac vein is considered an effective alternative. The advantages of this approach are that the wound size and bleeding amount are very small and that it can be performed under local anesthesia. Therefore, this approach can be used in patients with a poor general condition, including elderly patients.
topic Permanent pacemaker implantation
Iliac vein
Pocket infection
Subclavian vein occlusion
Local anesthesia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427615001118
work_keys_str_mv AT tetsuoyamaguchimd acasereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT takamichimiyamotomd acasereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT yasuteruyamauchimd acasereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT tohruobayashimd acasereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT tetsuoyamaguchimd casereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT takamichimiyamotomd casereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT yasuteruyamauchimd casereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
AT tohruobayashimd casereportofsuccessfulpermanentpacemakerimplantationviatheiliacvein
_version_ 1725508738681405440