Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria

<p>Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) evaluated the documentation provided by Austria to support the prolongation of the safeguard clause measure prohibiting the placing on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-09-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
GMO
Online Access:http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2878.pdf
id doaj-a0c2ac066e8c4c4db7de0e5e278dab66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a0c2ac066e8c4c4db7de0e5e278dab662021-05-02T01:11:46ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322012-09-0110910.2903/j.efsa.2012.2878Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in AustriaEFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)<p>Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) evaluated the documentation provided by Austria to support the prolongation of the safeguard clause measure prohibiting the placing on the market of the genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. The EFSA GMO Panel assessed whether the submitted documentation comprised new scientific information that would change or invalidate the conclusions of its previous risk assessments on oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3. The EFSA GMO Panel also considered the relevance of the concerns raised by Austria in the light of the most recent data published in the scientific literature. The authorised uses of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 exclude cultivation, but data on gene flow, persistence and invasiveness derived from cultivation were considered as a worst case, representing conditions where exposure and potential impact are expected to be the highest, to assess possible environmental impacts resulting from seed import spills. In the documentation provided by Austria and in the scientific literature, the EFSA GMO Panel could not identify new scientific evidence that indicates that the import and processing of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for feed uses in the EU pose a significant and imminent risk to the environment. In conclusion, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that, based on the documentation supplied by Austria and a review of recent scientific literature, there is no specific scientific evidence in terms of risk to the environment that would support the notification of a safeguard clause measure under Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC nor its prolongation, and that would invalidate its previous risk assessments of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3.</p>http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2878.pdfGMOoilseed rape (Brassica napus)Ms8 x Rf3Austriasafeguard clause measureenvironmentDirective 2001/18/EC
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
EFSA Journal
GMO
oilseed rape (Brassica napus)
Ms8 x Rf3
Austria
safeguard clause measure
environment
Directive 2001/18/EC
author_facet EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
title Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
title_short Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
title_full Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
title_sort scientific opinion on a request from the european commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events ms8, rf3 and ms8 x rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in austria
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) evaluated the documentation provided by Austria to support the prolongation of the safeguard clause measure prohibiting the placing on the market of the genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria. The EFSA GMO Panel assessed whether the submitted documentation comprised new scientific information that would change or invalidate the conclusions of its previous risk assessments on oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3. The EFSA GMO Panel also considered the relevance of the concerns raised by Austria in the light of the most recent data published in the scientific literature. The authorised uses of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 exclude cultivation, but data on gene flow, persistence and invasiveness derived from cultivation were considered as a worst case, representing conditions where exposure and potential impact are expected to be the highest, to assess possible environmental impacts resulting from seed import spills. In the documentation provided by Austria and in the scientific literature, the EFSA GMO Panel could not identify new scientific evidence that indicates that the import and processing of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3 for feed uses in the EU pose a significant and imminent risk to the environment. In conclusion, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that, based on the documentation supplied by Austria and a review of recent scientific literature, there is no specific scientific evidence in terms of risk to the environment that would support the notification of a safeguard clause measure under Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC nor its prolongation, and that would invalidate its previous risk assessments of oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3.</p>
topic GMO
oilseed rape (Brassica napus)
Ms8 x Rf3
Austria
safeguard clause measure
environment
Directive 2001/18/EC
url http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2878.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsgmo scientificopiniononarequestfromtheeuropeancommissionrelatedtotheprolongationofprohibitionoftheplacingonthemarketofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapeeventsms8rf3andms8xrf3forimportprocessingandfeedusesinaustria
_version_ 1721496632118214656