Escepticismo y desacuerdo
Within the framework of the epistemological debate on disagreement, this paper aims to examine the sceptical thesis that holds that, if it is impossible to rationally choose among two excluding positions, the only sensible or rational thing to do is to suspend judgement. The idea that ordinary life...
Main Author: | Rodrigo Laera |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/21348 |
Similar Items
-
Desacuerdos, paridad epistêmica e inchoerencia
by: Federico Matías Pailos, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Contextualism, skepticism, and invariantism
by: Stephen Jacobson
Published: (2010-09-01) -
The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
by: Justina Díaz Legaspe
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Escepticismo y desacuerdo
by: Rodrigo Laera
Published: (2012-04-01) -
DESACUERDO SIN FALTA Y RETRACTACIÓN UNA DEFENSA DEL RELATIVISMO SOBRE JUICIOS DE GUSTO
by: DAVID BORDONABA PLOU
Published: (2019-01-01)