Reduction of Lipid-Core Burden Index in Nonculprit Lesions at Follow-Up after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Study of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold versus Optimal Medical Therapy

• Main Authors: Joelle Kefer, Patrick Chenu, Olivier Gurné, Frederic Maes, Théophile Tamakloé, Christophe Beauloye
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2021-01-01
• Series: Journal of Interventional Cardiology
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5590093

Background. Non-flow-limiting nonculprit lesions (NCL) that contain a large lipid-rich necrotic core (nonculprit lipid-rich plaques (NC-LRP)) are most likely to cause recurrent acute coronary syndrome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) detects LRPs using the maximum 4 mm lipid-core burden index (maxLCBI4 mm). Few data are available regarding NIRS-guided therapy of these NC-LRPs, which are a potential target for preventive stenting. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) provides local drug delivery and could facilitate plaque passivation after resorption. This study sought to assess the safety of BVS implantation in NC-LRPs and its efficacy in reducing maxLCBI4 mm at 2-year follow-up after STEMI. Methods and Results. In total, 33 non-flow-limiting NCLs from 29 STEMI patients were included in this study. Of these, 15 were LRPs and were randomly assigned to either the BVS + optimal medical therapy (OMT) arm (group 1; N = 7) or the OMT arm (group 2; N = 8). At baseline, there were no differences in plaque characteristics between groups (fractional flow reserve: 0.85 ± 0.04 vs. 0.89 ± 0.06; diameter stenosis (DS): 43.4 ± 8 vs. 40.1 ± 10.7%; plaque burden 54.98 ± 5.8 vs. 49.76 ± 8.31%; and maxLCBI4 mm 402 [348; 564] vs. 373 [298; 516]; p=NS for all comparisons between groups 1 and 2, respectively). Seven BVSs were implanted 3 ± 1 days after STEMI in six patients, without complications. At angiographic follow-up (712 [657; 740] days), a significant and similar reduction of maxLCBI4 mm was observed in both groups, with a median change of 306 [257; 377] in group 1 vs. 300 [278; 346] in group 2 p=0.44. DS was significantly lower in group 1 vs. group 2 (19.8 ± 7 vs. 41.7 ± 13%, p=0.003), while plaque burden remained unchanged in both groups. Overall survival was 100%, target lesion failure was 13%, and stent thrombosis was 0%. Conclusions. BVS + OMT and OMT appear as similarly safe and effective in reducing maxLCBI4mm in NC-LRPs at 2-year follow-up after STEMI.