Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis

Background and purpose — The role of pelvic incidence in hip disorders is unclear. Therefore, we undertook a literature review to evaluate the evidence on that role. Methods — A search was carried out on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases. Quantitative analysis was based on comparison wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikhail Saltychev, Katri Pernaa, Matti Seppänen, Keijo Mäkelä, Katri Laimi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1377017
id doaj-a07d2b093ea04c049c05facc1f546c00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a07d2b093ea04c049c05facc1f546c002021-04-02T14:21:42ZengTaylor & Francis GroupActa Orthopaedica1745-36741745-36822018-01-01891667010.1080/17453674.2017.13770171377017Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysisMikhail Saltychev0Katri Pernaa1Matti Seppänen2Keijo Mäkelä3Katri Laimi4Department of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineTurku University Hospital and University of TurkuTurku University Hospital and University of TurkuTurku University Hospital and University of TurkuDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineBackground and purpose — The role of pelvic incidence in hip disorders is unclear. Therefore, we undertook a literature review to evaluate the evidence on that role. Methods — A search was carried out on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases. Quantitative analysis was based on comparison with a reference population of asymptomatic subjects. Results — The search resulted in 326 records: 15 studies were analyzed qualitatively and 13 quantitatively. The estimates of pelvic incidence varied more than 10 degrees from 47 (SD 3.7) to 59 (SD 14). 2 studies concluded that higher pelvic incidence might contribute to the development of coxarthrosis while 1 study reported the opposite findings. In 2 studies, lower pelvic incidence was associated with a mixed type of femoroacetabular impingement. We formed a reference population from asymptomatic groups used or cited in the selected studies. The reference comprised 777 persons with pooled average pelvic incidence of 53 (SD 10) degrees. The estimate showed a relatively narrow 95% CI of 52 to 54 degrees. The 95% CIs of only 4 studies did not overlap the CIs of reference: 2 studies on coxarthrosis, 1 on mixed femoroacetabular impingement, and 1 on ankylosing spondylitis Interpretation — We found no strong evidence that pelvic incidence plays any substantial role in hip disorders. Lower pelvic incidence may be associated with the mixed type of femoroacetabular impingement and hip problems amongst patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The evidence on association between pelvic incidence and coxarthrosis remained inconclusive.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1377017
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mikhail Saltychev
Katri Pernaa
Matti Seppänen
Keijo Mäkelä
Katri Laimi
spellingShingle Mikhail Saltychev
Katri Pernaa
Matti Seppänen
Keijo Mäkelä
Katri Laimi
Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
Acta Orthopaedica
author_facet Mikhail Saltychev
Katri Pernaa
Matti Seppänen
Keijo Mäkelä
Katri Laimi
author_sort Mikhail Saltychev
title Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
title_short Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
title_full Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
title_fullStr Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic incidence and hip disorders: A systematic review and quantitative analysis
title_sort pelvic incidence and hip disorders: a systematic review and quantitative analysis
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Acta Orthopaedica
issn 1745-3674
1745-3682
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and purpose — The role of pelvic incidence in hip disorders is unclear. Therefore, we undertook a literature review to evaluate the evidence on that role. Methods — A search was carried out on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases. Quantitative analysis was based on comparison with a reference population of asymptomatic subjects. Results — The search resulted in 326 records: 15 studies were analyzed qualitatively and 13 quantitatively. The estimates of pelvic incidence varied more than 10 degrees from 47 (SD 3.7) to 59 (SD 14). 2 studies concluded that higher pelvic incidence might contribute to the development of coxarthrosis while 1 study reported the opposite findings. In 2 studies, lower pelvic incidence was associated with a mixed type of femoroacetabular impingement. We formed a reference population from asymptomatic groups used or cited in the selected studies. The reference comprised 777 persons with pooled average pelvic incidence of 53 (SD 10) degrees. The estimate showed a relatively narrow 95% CI of 52 to 54 degrees. The 95% CIs of only 4 studies did not overlap the CIs of reference: 2 studies on coxarthrosis, 1 on mixed femoroacetabular impingement, and 1 on ankylosing spondylitis Interpretation — We found no strong evidence that pelvic incidence plays any substantial role in hip disorders. Lower pelvic incidence may be associated with the mixed type of femoroacetabular impingement and hip problems amongst patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The evidence on association between pelvic incidence and coxarthrosis remained inconclusive.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1377017
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailsaltychev pelvicincidenceandhipdisordersasystematicreviewandquantitativeanalysis
AT katripernaa pelvicincidenceandhipdisordersasystematicreviewandquantitativeanalysis
AT mattiseppanen pelvicincidenceandhipdisordersasystematicreviewandquantitativeanalysis
AT keijomakela pelvicincidenceandhipdisordersasystematicreviewandquantitativeanalysis
AT katrilaimi pelvicincidenceandhipdisordersasystematicreviewandquantitativeanalysis
_version_ 1721562460714958848