Emotions and Argumentation

The relationship between emotions and argumentation is not always clear. I attempt to clarify this issue by referring to three basic questions: (1) Do emotions constitute a certain kind of argumentation?; (2) Do emotions constitute rational argumentation?; (3) Do emotions constitute efficient argume...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aaron Ben-Zeev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 1995-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2407
id doaj-a067151558ec43abac9ed6abc5a9139c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a067151558ec43abac9ed6abc5a9139c2020-11-25T03:10:24ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1995-01-0117210.22329/il.v17i2.2407Emotions and ArgumentationAaron Ben-ZeevThe relationship between emotions and argumentation is not always clear. I attempt to clarify this issue by referring to three basic questions: (1) Do emotions constitute a certain kind of argumentation?; (2) Do emotions constitute rational argumentation?; (3) Do emotions constitute efficient argumentation? I will claim that there are many circumstances in which the answer to these questions is positive. After describing such circumstances, the educational implications of the connection between emotions and argumentation will be indicated.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2407
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron Ben-Zeev
spellingShingle Aaron Ben-Zeev
Emotions and Argumentation
Informal Logic
author_facet Aaron Ben-Zeev
author_sort Aaron Ben-Zeev
title Emotions and Argumentation
title_short Emotions and Argumentation
title_full Emotions and Argumentation
title_fullStr Emotions and Argumentation
title_full_unstemmed Emotions and Argumentation
title_sort emotions and argumentation
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 1995-01-01
description The relationship between emotions and argumentation is not always clear. I attempt to clarify this issue by referring to three basic questions: (1) Do emotions constitute a certain kind of argumentation?; (2) Do emotions constitute rational argumentation?; (3) Do emotions constitute efficient argumentation? I will claim that there are many circumstances in which the answer to these questions is positive. After describing such circumstances, the educational implications of the connection between emotions and argumentation will be indicated.
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2407
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronbenzeev emotionsandargumentation
_version_ 1724658856283340800