Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis is universal across the United States; however, each state chooses the method by which they screen. Illinois employs a two-step process which includes the measurement of the immunoreactive trypsinogen followed by an assay designed to detect 74 of the most common...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maura Fox, Angelique Mercier, Adrienne Savant, Theresa A Laguna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X20939421
id doaj-a06628ba75f2499581fa9dcae44e726c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a06628ba75f2499581fa9dcae44e726c2020-11-25T03:53:14ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medical Case Reports2050-313X2020-07-01810.1177/2050313X20939421Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?Maura Fox0Angelique Mercier1Adrienne Savant2Theresa A Laguna3College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, MA, USADivision of Genetics, Birth Defects and Metabolism, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USADivision of Pulmonary & Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USADivision of Pulmonary & Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USANewborn screening for cystic fibrosis is universal across the United States; however, each state chooses the method by which they screen. Illinois employs a two-step process which includes the measurement of the immunoreactive trypsinogen followed by an assay designed to detect 74 of the most common genetic mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein. We report the case of an infant born in Illinois with a positive cystic fibrosis newborn screening with an elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen and two genetic mutations identified (F508del/F508del). The primary care physician informed the parents their child had cystic fibrosis and referred her for a confirmatory sweat test which was negative for cystic fibrosis. Upon further investigation, the assay was found to have been set up incorrectly and repeat analysis identified the genotype F508del/F508C. This case highlights the importance of performing the confirmatory sweat test prior to making a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X20939421
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maura Fox
Angelique Mercier
Adrienne Savant
Theresa A Laguna
spellingShingle Maura Fox
Angelique Mercier
Adrienne Savant
Theresa A Laguna
Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
author_facet Maura Fox
Angelique Mercier
Adrienne Savant
Theresa A Laguna
author_sort Maura Fox
title Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
title_short Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
title_full Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
title_fullStr Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
title_full_unstemmed Cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: Or is it?
title_sort cystic fibrosis diagnosed by state newborn screening: or is it?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
issn 2050-313X
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis is universal across the United States; however, each state chooses the method by which they screen. Illinois employs a two-step process which includes the measurement of the immunoreactive trypsinogen followed by an assay designed to detect 74 of the most common genetic mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein. We report the case of an infant born in Illinois with a positive cystic fibrosis newborn screening with an elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen and two genetic mutations identified (F508del/F508del). The primary care physician informed the parents their child had cystic fibrosis and referred her for a confirmatory sweat test which was negative for cystic fibrosis. Upon further investigation, the assay was found to have been set up incorrectly and repeat analysis identified the genotype F508del/F508C. This case highlights the importance of performing the confirmatory sweat test prior to making a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X20939421
work_keys_str_mv AT maurafox cysticfibrosisdiagnosedbystatenewbornscreeningorisit
AT angeliquemercier cysticfibrosisdiagnosedbystatenewbornscreeningorisit
AT adriennesavant cysticfibrosisdiagnosedbystatenewbornscreeningorisit
AT theresaalaguna cysticfibrosisdiagnosedbystatenewbornscreeningorisit
_version_ 1724479300165435392